Well as a matter of fact, that sequencing is based on samples taken from patients in paris... So it's kind of "in the wild", akshually... >On Friday January 24, late in the morning, the Institut Pasteur received **samples of three suspected cases (two patients in Paris and one in Bordeaux**). "Using the samples taken from these patients, we detected the novel coronavirus," says Sylvie Behillil, Deputy Director of the CNR at the Institut Pasteur. From Friday January 24, 2020. Viral genome sequenced at the Institut Pasteur **That same Friday evening, scientists launched the process of sequencing the viral genome based on the samples.** The CNR prepared the material for sequencing, ready for P2M to begin work immediately the following Monday. The sequencing run was completed by early evening on the Tuesday, and the scientists used data analysis to obtain the sequence of the whole genome in two of the first three confirmed cases in France. "This proves the efficacy of the CNR's process of analysis based on viral sequencing," continues Vincent Enouf. ... >Governments admit they have no samples of the world's most prolific virus. Well, no, obviously, you can at least exclude the french gov from "governments" here. >Tests used to establish a pandemic detect proteins from influenza and corona. Influenza and corona were used because they had no sample of c19. All of which use invalid cycle thresholds - unless "vaccinated." Which is irrelevant as the tests can't be used as tests, per the inventor of the technology (who died after saying this). RT-PCR tests are reliable, depends on you run them though... As a matter of fact they are used to detect pathogens, it's kind of gold standard since decades when it comes to that >Reliability of the RT-PCR test To guarantee the performance of the test under development, **scientists employed a system able to detect whether the three sequences used to recognize SARS-CoV-2 were present in other living organisms. With regard to the RT-PCR tests developed by the National Reference Center, the three sequences are not present simultaneously in any other organisms apart from SARS-CoV-2.** The test is then validated on primary samples (confirmed as positive and negative) to verify its specificity and sensitivity (no false positives or false negatives). Negative controls (here for example nose or throat samples taken before 2019) can help assess the risk of non-specific amplification. Finally, it is advisable to use two different tests (the two tests developed by the CNR at the Institut Pasteur are named IP2 and IP4) on the same sample to guarantee the reliability of the result. This means that six sequences of the viral genome, rather than three, need to be recognized and amplified, thereby increasing the reliability of RT-PCR testing. ... >>We have a pandemic of a virus none can find, established with a test which detects colds and flus which are administered to always provide invalid results. Lab sequencing is 100g irrelevant. Requires zero forgery. That statement is just flat wrong, see above Sources https://www.pasteur.fr/en/press-area/press-documents/institut-pasteur-sequences-whole-genome-coronavirus-2019-ncov https://www.pasteur.fr/en/home/press-area/press-documents/operation-and-reliability-rt-pcr-tests-detection-sars-cov-2