WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

https://vid8.poal.co/user/0k_/mC2Nc3M

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Two studies invalidating institut pasteur findings and methods? Source or that's a baseless claim

[–] 0 pt (edited )

They were covered here. Your ignorance of them and handwaving of the facts doesn't change it.

Even the CDC admits to what I've stated on the tests. So your links are useless.

There is zero proof there is a pandemic. The CDC's own stats support this conclusion. This is the reason colds, flus, and pneumonia are suddenly all covid. Because that's literally what they test for.

For someone with so many links you don't seem to know anything about what's going on. Which is a bit suspicious.

[–] 0 pt

All I see is that you can't provide any of those so called sources to back your claims, and instead you feel the need to rely on ad hominem attacks in place of arguments.

That's therefore a weak rebuttal on your part, to say the least.

And I'm just being factual here.

I know why those PCR tests returned so much false positives in the US, there are two reasons (at least) as far as I can tell. Incorrect Ct values being one of them (as its inventor suggested btw). Can you name the second reason?

[–] 0 pt

on ad hominem attacks

I did none.

So what you're saying is that you've gone out of your way to ignore all evidence which doesn't meet your person position and anyone pointing it out is not only the cause of your ignorance, but stating this is an ad hominem attack.

Cough.

Most of what I've stated has had daily discussions here, supported by a variety of sources. Yet you don't seem to know anything about that. And suddenly that's my burden.

Lol.

Have a nice day.