“Both causes of severe bodily harm are largely preventable — covid-19 through vaccination..."
The author of the article accepted this statement as fact when it is known to be absolutely false. This flaws his response.
I took it in the sense that the author advocates accepting the premise to better be able to use it against them. Perhaps I was mistaken.
>
“Both causes of severe bodily harm are largely preventable — covid-19 through vaccination..."
>
The author of the article accepted this statement as fact when it is known to be absolutely false. This flaws his response.
I took it in the sense that the author advocates accepting the premise to better be able to use it against them.
Perhaps I was mistaken.
(post is archived)