"What has happened… is that the Delta variant has taken over all other variants in Iceland. And it has come to light that vaccinated individuals can contract it relatively easily and spread infection."
Variants are like 0.1% different then the source virus. So your telling me a Virus only had to mutate to a point of 0.1% different to evade the vax? Sounds like a shit vax.
Also when you throw in the fact that people who had the older Sars virus show antibodies against covid. So please tell me how this vax is better than my immune system.
So your telling me a Virus only had to mutate to a point of 0.1% different to evade the vax? Sounds like a shit vax.
That's the craziest part of their argument that the vax is "safe and effective." Really? The slightest variation in the virus renders it obsolete, but you're gonna tell me it's effective?
C'mon, man!
;-)
I believe Yeadon stated all these “variants” are .1 to .3 different from the original and even if “delta” mutates it will stay in that range from the original and natural immunity would protect you, since your innate immune system took a “snapshot” of the entire virus instead of one specific portion of one fragment(the s protein) with the vax.
So then you have possible multiple scenarios taking place. ADE, lowered immune system, the Red Cross just put out a request asking for antibodies from people recovered from covid but not vaccinated because the vaccinated antibodies destroy natural antibodies(who knows, nobody in the msm questioned it).
Then you have the study put out about the innate immune system. It’s flaw is it only takes one “snapshot” of a specific virus for future use. So if you caught influenza A the first time as a child, those flus will be milder when you catch them again compared to a influenza B.
I get confused on this part since I can’t find the study.
If you vaccinate every retard with only one specific fragment from one protein, that’s your “snapshot” for your innate immune system to remember(t cells, which can call antibodies etc). I can’t recall if it’s the specific fragment or a different protein mutation and your immune system won’t think of it as a threat. That’s why once vaxxed you can never gain natural immunity, your body already has its snapshot of the “threat” and disregards the rest.
I hope that’s understandable.
It’s flaw is it only takes one “snapshot” of a specific virus for future use. I can’t find the study.
Maybe you can find it if you use the search terms "original antigenic sin" or "antigenic imprinting: https://infogalactic.com/info/Original_antigenic_sin
The original antigenic sin: When the body first encounters an infection it produces effective antibodies against its dominant antigens and thus eliminates the infection. But when it encounters the same infection, at a later evolved stage, with a new dominant antigen, with the original antigen now being recessive, the immune system will still produce the former antibodies against this old "now recessive antigen" and not develop new antibodies against the new dominant one, this results in the production of ineffective antibodies and thus a weak immunity.
I hope that’s understandable.
It is, and thank you for writing it.
I believe Yeadon stated all these “variants” are .1 to .3 different from the original and even if “delta” mutates it will stay in that range from the original and natural immunity would protect you, since your innate immune system took a “snapshot” of the entire virus instead of one specific portion of one fragment(the s protein) with the vax.
So then you have possible multiple scenarios taking place. ADE, lowered immune system, the Red Cross just put out a request asking for antibodies from people recovered from covid but not vaccinated because the vaccinated antibodies destroy natural antibodies(who knows, nobody in the msm questioned it).
Then you have the study put out about the innate immune system. It’s flaw is it takes a “snapshot” of the original virus for future use. So if you caught influenza A the first time as a child, those flus will be milder when you catch them again compared to a influenza B.
I get confused on this part since I can’t find the study.
If you vaccinate every retard with only one specific fragment from one protein, that’s your “snapshot” for your innate immune system to remember(t cells, which can call antibodies etc). I can’t recall if it’s the specific fragment or a different protein mutation and your immune system won’t think of it as a threat. That’s why once vaxxed you can never gain natural immunity, your body already has its snapshot of the “threat” and disregards the rest.
I hope that’s understandable.
The vaccine induced pseudo infection creates low quality antibodies that made it easier for the virus to evade. This was expected. The question is why the pharma industry hasn't reacted. The sequence in the mRNA vaccines and the payload of the viral vector vaccines is computer generated, a new vaccine can get created in days. Then 2 months testing for the EUAs and the vaccines would have eradicated the delta variant. Maybe they want to keep the virus alive because it fits their agenda better than a effective vaccine.
I thought they were given full reign to change the vaccines at will with no further testing required?
Never heard about that. The FDA is in the pocket of the pharma industry, but in their hearts, they are still bureaucrats - would they really give up all of their power?
(post is archived)