Do you understand that the entire journal and peer review system is fundamentally kiked and that an overwhelming portion of the findings from (((peer reviewed))) articles cannot be replicated? Who gives a shit if it's a journal that will raise the author's circle jerk Z score. If the article is based on facts and actual research then let it stand. And "tainted" is 100% factually correct in reference to vaxxed blood. We should be calling things like they are and not mincing words.
Do you understand that the entire journal and peer review system is fundamentally kiked and that an overwhelming portion of the findings from (((peer reviewed))) articles cannot be replicated? Who gives a shit if it's a journal that will raise the author's circle jerk Z score. If the article is based on facts and actual research then let it stand. And "tainted" is 100% factually correct in reference to vaxxed blood. We should be calling things like they are and not mincing words.
Yes. Don't expect a lot of impact even if this is 100% true is what I suggest. Business as usual, ya know?
Yes. Don't expect a lot of impact even if this is 100% true is what I suggest. Business as usual, ya know?
(post is archived)