I guess I see your point but it’s dangerous to classify language as a weapon, if I had to agree I’d say there needs to be a different classification.
I guess I see your point but it’s dangerous to classify language as a weapon, if I had to agree I’d say there needs to be a different classification.
What the title really means is that language is a weapon of the globalist class. It just sounds more dramatic to say it's a weapon. A different way of putting it could be that language is weaponizable capable of being weaponized.
What the title really means is that language is a weapon of the globalist class. It just sounds more dramatic to say it's a weapon. A different way of putting it could be that language is ~~weaponizable~~ capable of being weaponized.
(post is archived)