WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

It took me awhile to realize he means "lack of moral-ized" and not "demoralized" in the military combat sense.

[–] 2 pts

Can you expand on this? I'm not aware of the difference.

[–] 4 pts

Demoralization always meant to take away someone's morale, not their morals.

[–] 2 pts

Ah okay thanks.

[–] 0 pt

Crunchy, he is referring to the radical transformation of societal values in order to undermine a society. Look at how those who espouse the progressive radical agenda hate this country, and how degenerate this nation has become. There is no convincing them otherwise, even if you present them with irrefutable evidence to the contrary. Also, it needs to be pointed out that one of the goals of “active measures”, or demoralization, is to present the American people with so much conflicting information that they cannot come to a sensible conclusion about anything...yeah, that ship has landed, for sure...

[–] 2 pts

Yea it took me a bit as well. Basically, if you were raised to be a degenerate dick sucking faggot, someone trying to convince you that the straight homogenous nuclear family is the ideal is going to have a really hard time.

[–] 2 pts

dick sucking faggot

really hard time

Heh.

[–] 0 pt

Wait, are we sure about this? How has this not come up before?

It never fully made sense to me because I assumed he was using it the normal way.

[–] 2 pts

It wouldn't make sense in the context he's using it.