WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts (edited )

libtards worship science as a god, until actual data conflicts with their delusional worldview, then suddenly they're ok with denying science.

Soyjack.png

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

What they worship isn't science but leftist ideology promoted by people pretending to be scientists. The whole business is corrupt beyond belief and most published "scientific" papers are frauds supported by and referring to other papers that are just as fraudulent. The issue with this meme is the simple fact we are NOT all one species if the rules applied to all other creatures was applied to "people". It's hotly denied but your eyes, ears, and nose knows better.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt
[–] 2 pts (edited )

It's called scientism. It's their religion. It's became part of the identity of self. To attack it is to attack their own concept of self. Cognitive dissonance is painful. As most Democrats never mentality/psychologically matured past high school, they have no means of coping aside from crying or attacking.

Never forget, you're arguing with children trapped in an adult's body. A child who worships both the state's supreme authority and their false religion, as prescribed by that authority.

[–] 1 pt

Middle school at best

[–] 0 pt

Comment is based on a study I read years ago that brain maturity never advances past puberty. Meaning, no adult brain.

Human brain develops considerably through high school. For most is fully matured between the ages of 21-25. For leftists, their brain never leaves pubescent maturity.

It's true to say, even speaking with leftists, you are engaged with a child stuck in an adult's body.

[–] 2 pts

I like that they used a mangy coyote with it's tongue hanging out

[–] 1 pt

That's not even the best example

[–] 0 pt
[–] 1 pt

That brings up another point, they sure do love using race mixing as "proof" that "we're all exactly the same, race is only skin deep" whenever someone mentions how blacks are at best a sub-species of homo sapiens.

but coyotes and wolves are considered totally different species and can breed viable offspring.

Polar and Grizzly bears too.

Even the offspring of Lions and Tigers, previously thought to be sterile like Mules have now been show to be capable of creating viable offspring.

so with the "any animals that can breed are the same species" argument debunked what do we have left to categorize species?

appearance and physical morphology, genetics, and behavior. based on these criteria there at at minimum 3 different species groups of humanoid, Caucasians (Whites, Iranians, Arabs/North Africans, Indians), Sub-Saharan Africans (Ethiopians, Congolese/central Africans, West Africans, ect...) and Asians (Central Asians, East Asians, South East Asians, and Oceanian Asians). I'm unsure whether Amerindians should be included as a sub-species in Asians due to their siberian origins or set aside as an entirely different group. Australians abos I'm not sure whether to categorize at all, they're literally dumber than Africans.