One, two, three, four, five, six.
Six states with fraud altering the outcome via post-election ballots, which, according to Supreme Court established precedent, mandates that the vote count revert to tallies at midnight of Election Day.
Why is the Supreme Court not recognizing their own precedent?
Why are you not stomping the Supreme Court’s heads into the ground for refusing to do so?
(Metaphorically, of course.)
One, two, three, four, five, six.
Six states with fraud altering the outcome via post-election ballots, which, according to Supreme Court established precedent, mandates that the vote count revert to tallies at midnight of Election Day.
Why is the Supreme Court not recognizing their own precedent?
Why are you not stomping the Supreme Court’s heads into the ground for refusing to do so?
(Metaphorically, of course.)
In minecraftworld
In minecraftworld
(post is archived)