Semitism breeds anti-semitism. I'm sure lefties would say whiteness breeds anti-whiteness however the main difference here is how whiteness exists as a function of general superiority essentially whiteness exists in a meritocratic ethos wherever whites are present in significant numbers and it makes non whites who can't measure up to our behavioral minimums and standards feel inferior and those who refuse to measure up feel put upon to be more proficient and efficient in their life and work,essentially it breeds insecurity in others from a passive superiority. Semitism on the other hand is a dual function of both passive and active in group bias and typically an active outgroup disdain or resentment. They reject all pressure historical or modern to change this behavior and reject that their behavior led them to be persecuted resulting in an underlying 0ersecutiin complex of this conditions semitism which they feel justifies this hypocrisy all while ignoring the circular nature of that reasoning and how it has led to more persecution historically. Anybody with an IQ in the upper 20% reading this, I challenge you to learn our enemy's post modernist drivel and beat them back in their own arena, they are building their case on a house of cards that rests entirely on not challenging the core presumptions of their ideology if we challenge them in their own terms and defeat them we can begin to break the conditioning they hold by using philological and rhetorical judo, using their own weasel words to knock them off balance. Their case rests on reframing categories. In new rhetorically potent language but never challenging the consequences of the inspired impetus. Post modernism asserts that we can deconstruct all social constructs and re-organize or define them at will but nobody ever challenges them on the "why should we?" part because they hide behind edge cases of historical oppression or repression and nonchalantly exclude whites from being defined as repressed because of the progressive stack, nobody tells these snow flakes that the progressive stack is a social construct which poorly reflects reality. They deny racial differences and the evidence that supports these racial differences are a biological reality but hide behind social constructs being the defining factors in different societies yet still attack the most successful society's obviously successful social constructs and they will deny this by saying that success is a social construct but if you make them define elements of modern western life as positive, valuable or successful and then demonstrate how other societies never developed these things they like or love or only ever developed inferior versions you can argue that the series of "toxic" social constructs they call whiteness are fundamentally responsible for their current quality of life, maintaining that quality of life and improving that quality of life and that in fact "whiteness" or as it should be defined "the common western ethos" is fundamentality responsible for all the positive elements of modern life and and should be hailed as the most superior package of social constructs in the world today.