![Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution [1222x1341 - 1.18MB]](https://pic8.co/sh/fLiAZs.png){kind=link}
Calling them invaders does match some definitions of the worder invader:
to enter as if to take possession:
to enter and affect injuriously or destructively, as disease:
to intrude upon:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/invader
So we are good, there.
The missing pieces is #2 from that image's 3 main points and that is the right of the people to take up weapons against the invaders to defend against their invasion. That's all I will say about this topic.
Calling them invaders does match some definitions of the worder invader:
>to enter as if to take possession:
>to enter and affect injuriously or destructively, as disease:
>to intrude upon:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/invader
So we are good, there.
The missing pieces is #2 from that image's 3 main points and that is the right of the people to take up weapons against the invaders to defend against their invasion. That's all I will say about this topic.
If the government doesn't stand against invaders, that means it sides with them, thus the right for the people (American citizens) to form a militia to defend themselves against the corrupt/treasonous government.
If the government doesn't stand against invaders, that means it sides with them, thus the right for the people (American citizens) to form a militia to defend themselves against the corrupt/treasonous government.
(post is archived)