WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

It was only on VOAT twice, and called out for bullshit then like now. Read the posts and comments for yourself. If there was any truth behind it, it would have been referenced far more often and become hive knowledge.

Https://searchvoat.co/v/QRV/3190082

https://searchvoat.co/v/QRV/3321433

[–] 1 pt
[–] 0 pt

13 post occurances, good job. This shows Operation Trust was posted more than just twice. Now does that actually prove anything new?

Are they all based only on pages 13-14 like the first two occurrences I found and read and discovered anons debunked within the original posts themselves? If that is all they offer for historic background, I dtill fail to see the parallels between Operation Trust and the Q movement. The other posts need to provide more info than the first two which were simply based on an article displaying pages 13-14.

That was the second part of my point ~8 days ago, I asked to show me the parallels that make these operations "almost exactly alike" because pages 13 and 14 described nothing at all like the Q movement. This is what I want to debate. Show me what you guys are pushing as these direct parallels between OT and Q. They are by far 2 different animals.

[–] 0 pt

Lurker, don't take my post the wrong way, didn't you see the second link?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

You believer in (((Q)))? You fall for that like trash?

Hurrrr accept niggers and all nonWhites!

Is more obvious of a jew piece of control than make genial mutilation.

Also searchvoat, while good isn't exhaustive. There's lots missing. The ironic thing is I can't prove this.

[–] 0 pt

The search string you posted earlier didn't work for me. It was listing every post on VOAT regardless of content. I went to searchvoat, selected Incude NSFW to make sure all sub verse titles were checked and typed Operation Trust in the search field. These were the only two entries that came up. Note that they are in /v/QRV. It was probably one of you clowns that originally planted it! Just guessing.

Also searchvoat, while good isn't exhaustive. There's lots missing. The ironic thing is I can't prove this.

Isn't exhaustive? It's a simple string search function that if flawed, anons would have been screaming to get it fixed. Searchvoat was always getting accolades as a great search tool. If it's in the database title string, searchvoat will find it. If it was all over VOAT back then, where are all of those phantom posts your anti-Q brigade claims? They don't exist and so your brigade is pushing more lies. You can't prove it because it is false. I welcome your efforts to prove me wrong.