It was only on VOAT twice, and you didn't miss anything. Read the posts and comments for yourself, both entries were bullshit. If there was any truth behind it, it would have been referenced far more often and become hive knowledge.
That was kinda my point. It was all over voat is inaccurate at best.
It was all over voat is inaccurate at best.
And the assertion Operation Trust has direct parallels with the Q movement is incredibly misleading at best.
Now note all those on this thread defending these lies with more lies, producing fake sauce and exaggeration, hoping that no one digs into their "proof". Same old gang of shitposters that come after Q posts and content at best, Feds at worst.
Isnt that searching for posts, not actual comments that end up discussing it in various threads ?/.
Correct, dass. I searched for posts with "Operation Trust" only within the title. The search Anticlutch provided was constructed to pick up all comments with the words operation and the word trust within [https://searchvoat.co/search.php?st=comments&t=Operation+Trust&co=on]. Phrases like "I don't trust that operation" would get listed, not exclusively the occurrences of "operation trust". I read through a few comments picked up by the Anticlutch search, they had no reference to Operation Trust and the comments were about totally different subjects. I wasn't going to waste my time reading through more of them, so I searched titles with Operation Trust which reduced the hit rate to the two posts aforementioned.
My search was titles only, "include NSFW" enabled for the string"Operation Trust". These 2 posts were discussed and concept discarded within the comments in those 2 threads from years ago. I didn't bother looking for "Operation Trust" in comment threads of other posts because they didn't hold muster in their own original threads, just as anyone who understands the Q movement and actually reads pages 13-14 can see today.
(post is archived)