Only one I'll disagree with is Atom bomb. There is side evidence for those detonations. Rest is correct.
Only one I'll disagree with is Atom bomb. There is side evidence for those detonations. Rest is correct.
There is side evidence for those detonations.
From the talmudvision, amirite?
> There is side evidence for those detonations.
From the talmudvision, amirite?
No. Paintings prior to the 1900s. They can test the paints used. After the first detonations, there's isotopes that are unique to atomic detonation that permeate everything in small quantities now. Similar to DDT. Those old paintings do not have said isotopes. It's how they determine authentic from fakes for paintings from that era.
No. Paintings prior to the 1900s. They can test the paints used. After the first detonations, there's isotopes that are unique to atomic detonation that permeate everything in small quantities now. Similar to DDT. Those old paintings do not have said isotopes. It's how they determine authentic from fakes for paintings from that era.
there's isotopes that are unique to atomic detonation that permeate everything in small quantities now.
If these isotopes permeate everything in small quantities, why don't they apply to older/prior paintings then?
> there's isotopes that are unique to atomic detonation that permeate everything in small quantities now.
If these isotopes permeate everything in small quantities, why don't they apply to older/prior paintings then?
(post is archived)