With the government continuing to tell people they can't collect rent or evict it also calls into question who really owns the property.
That one line from the article... that one line sums it up: "The justices held that it was unconstitutionally excessive for Seattle to impound a homeless man’s truck and require him to reimburse the city nearly $550 in towing and storage costs."
The fucking audacity of that reporter to write it in such a way!
The whole story would have sounded differently if he would have said:
"The justices held that it was unconstitutionally excessive for Seattle to impound a homeless man’s truck home and require him to reimburse the city nearly $550 in towing and storage costs."
....see how nuance can be used to influence the reader's perception?
(post is archived)