Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Grosskreutz was arrested with his second OWI (operating while intoxicated) and a case was filed on January 21, 2021. This was only a couple of months after he attempted to kill Kyle Rittenhouse. Along with the above charge, another charge for refusing to take a blood-alcohol test was also dismissed on October 28, 2021. Again, this was only a couple of days before Grosskreutz testified in the Rittenhouse case.

[Gateway Pundit Article](https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/breaking-exclusive-potential-witness-tampering-gaige-grosskreutz-felon-aimed-gun-kyle-rittenhouse-two-prior-charges-dismissed-prosecutors-days-trial/) >Grosskreutz was arrested with his second OWI (operating while intoxicated) and a case was filed on January 21, 2021. This was only a couple of months after he attempted to kill Kyle Rittenhouse. Along with the above charge, another charge for refusing to take a blood-alcohol test was also dismissed on October 28, 2021. Again, this was only a couple of days before Grosskreutz testified in the Rittenhouse case.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (10).
[–] • 3 pts

It’s not allowed to be mentioned at trial. The point is that GrossKike could just plead the fifth to all questioning, so he’s granted immunity to tell his “honest” story with no chance of self incriminating. Mentioning this to the jury would unjustly alter their perception of his testimony and cause a mistrial

[–] • 0 pt

How is it not fucking relevant that testimony can be essentially "bought" by offering a "get out of jail free card"?! This should absolutely be allowed to be brought before the jury. The guy has a motive to lie, to go with the DA's story- to stay out of fucking prison.

[–] • 0 pt

He’s not granted immunity from perjury, he’s given immunity from circumstances of the case.

For example the driver of a drive-by shooting would never testify because he’d just land himself in prison. But if he was the only witness to the shooting, they’d grant him immunity to get his testimony against the shooter.

Same type of deal here. GrossKike did illegal things and would never testify only to incriminate himself, so they drop his charges in order to get his honest testimony.

In theory, he doesn’t have any more reason to lie under oath than any other prosecution witness