Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Lots of spooks in the comments claiming the missile explosion was a sonic boom and making other false claims. They go after every comment with their propaganda.

They want to claim it was low flying when the radar indicates it was at 34000 ft. I'm not an expert here but one comment claims the no fly zone is below 18000ft. So likely this was an illegal shoot down.

They are also claiming the plane was not shot down. 3 frames show that it fell from 34000 to 30000 and accelerated from 460mph to over 575mph before the radar stopped giving telemetry. That was just as it made what looks like a u turn, but given the speed increase and altitude loss can only be a nosedive that reversed the planes trajectory.

They are in major damage control mode on what is clearly an illegal shooting down of a small plane that was not breaking any laws.

Lots of spooks in the comments claiming the missile explosion was a sonic boom and making other false claims. They go after every comment with their propaganda. They want to claim it was low flying when the radar indicates it was at 34000 ft. I'm not an expert here but one comment claims the no fly zone is below 18000ft. So likely this was an illegal shoot down. They are also claiming the plane was not shot down. 3 frames show that it fell from 34000 to 30000 and accelerated from 460mph to over 575mph before the radar stopped giving telemetry. That was just as it made what looks like a u turn, but given the speed increase and altitude loss can only be a nosedive that reversed the planes trajectory. They are in major damage control mode on what is clearly an illegal shooting down of a small plane that was not breaking any laws.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (32).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Goofy , go argue with the released facts, it did a u turn and continued to fly straight over DC or some such then did a sudden altitude drop spiraling into the ground. you're clearly confused again.

And wrong yet again.

Edit; From msm 'The flight did a U-Turn over Washington DC on its flightpath while heading toward New York. NORAD aircraft used flares to try and draw attention from the pilot. ' and yes it flew off, bc it clearly didnt crash land in DC. You're all types orf stupid today.

[–] • 0 pt

hur der the news said so therfore it must be true.

Fuck off retard. The video I posted literally proves that clame wrong.

Fucking kike.

[–] • 0 pt

The video shows it doing a u-turn at 16 secs. Bwaahahahahahhaaaa . What a tardite - or did you not even watch your own link.

[–] • 0 pt

Read the description. That is not a u turn. The aircraft is shot down, it nosedives and then ends up going in the opposite direction upside down. At the point of direction change it falls from 34k to 30k feet i3 frames of the video and accelerates by over 100mph.

THAT IS NOT A U TURN. A Cessna can NOT turn around WHILE ACCELERATING, let alone accelerate faster than an F1 car.