WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

984

Whats the ulterior motive here? Are LEDs worse for eyes? Is the refresh rate (Hz) of LEDs hypnotic? The color warmth shift towards blue or red cause health issues? Or do LEDs produce a particular frequency that can be used to map rooms remotely?

Whats the ulterior motive here? Are LEDs worse for eyes? Is the refresh rate (Hz) of LEDs hypnotic? The color warmth shift towards blue or red cause health issues? Or do LEDs produce a particular frequency that can be used to map rooms remotely?

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts (edited )

Apart from your questions, incandescent generates warmth to surrounding air. Light bulbs help noticeably to heat homes in winter. Heating bills increased after the adoption of non-incandescent bulbs due to lights not helping to warm rooms, so the furnace is more active and more heating energy used.

They noticed this with street lights as well. Incandescent bulbs would heat the housing of the street lights and prevent snow and ice buildup in winter, but the switch to LED bulbs in street lights caused snow and ice to build up easily on them.

Some cities then needed to budget for paying crews to go out and clean street lights of snow and ice, and a supply of de-icing treatments to spray the street lights with to attempt to prevent buildup which could lead to road accidents.

Regardless, road accidents still increased as snow and ice still blocked street lights despite treatments and cleaning crews trying to keep them clean. This issue, in combination with most drivers also being idiots, particularly in winter, was a cause for an increase in "accidents". Thus there was also an increase in vehicle insurance costs.

By one minor change to replacing incandescent bulbs with non-incandescent bulbs, the cities caused a cascade effect. The minor savings in costs that came from switching to non-incandescent bulbs which would need to be replaced less frequently, were shifted onto the tax-payers. The city now had to pay for maintenance of the new lights with tax dollars that amounts to more than the occasional replacing of incandescent bulbs, so taxes increased to pay for that. People living/working in the cities also found they needed to pay more for insurance due to the increase in accidents in the areas they lived/worked due to now being a 'high accident area' in winter.

By forbidding incandescent in homes/businesses (by forbidding and removing the supply of new bulbs to replace existing ones), the most obvious and immediate effect would be that heating bills will increase. It will be only a matter of time before incandescent is phased out from (nearly all) homes and businesses due to needing to make the forced switch to alternates when replacement is needed due to lack of supply of incandescent.

It is part of the kikes' destructive agenda.