WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

622

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

which they can Not if they wanted to

This is false. The SCOTUS ruled they aren't responsible for protecting individuals in a number of cases, meaning if they fail to protect you, you cannot go after them in court. It did not rule they are not allowed to protect individuals.

Most ZOGbots are bad news though and would gladly execute you to keep their pension as long as jews tell them you are "the bad guys".

[–] 0 pt

Where did you get 'not allowed'?

[–] 0 pt

Just in case his lawyers do not know, The SCOTUS has ruled that law enforcement is NOT responsible for protecting the citizen (which they can Not if they wanted to).

[–] 0 pt

"Read "NOT responsible for" as "isn't required to".

[–] 0 pt

Read it again and look up 'Responsible'. It does not mean allowed.