>Yeah I know, but it had been widely rumored to be the opposite. Even here…
From the Poal link that you provided:
>The Arizona rancher who became the face of the border crisis after he was charged with shooting a migrant dead on his land will not face a new trial.
I think you're confused.
>>Yeah I know, but it had been widely rumored to be the opposite. Even here…
From the Poal link that you provided:
>>The Arizona rancher who became the face of the border crisis after he was charged with shooting a migrant dead on his land will not face a new trial.
I think you're confused.
My bad, I guess I did not make it clear that I was referring to the jury count. Not about the acquittal itself. It had been reported or inferred that it was a 7-1 for conviction as in level_101’s post I provided when in fact it turns out the jury voted 7-1 for acquittal.
My bad, I guess I did not make it clear that I was referring to the jury count. Not about the acquittal itself. It had been reported or inferred that it was a 7-1 for conviction as in level_101’s post I provided when in fact it turns out the jury voted 7-1 for acquittal.
(post is archived)