Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

The only thing you should be able to buy with "food stamps" are non-prepared fresh foods. You know, so you have to cook them yourself. Also, its a fucking scam. Why are you allowed to buy Red Bull with food stamps? Because some bitchy liberal complained that it was dehumanizing they couldn't buy stuff like chips and soda and the junk food industry lobby ran with it because they saw free government money coming their way.

Nearly two thirds of SNAP recipients who could work did not, says the report

It is a program intended to help you while you are down. Not for you to just live off of your neighbors labor/taxes. TWO OUT OF THREE SHOULD BE WORKING AND DONT.

Archive: https://archive.today/ioBKT

From the post:

>The food stamps scheme used by 42 million US residents has become too widespread and costly and hooks recipients on welfare, new research shows. The conservative Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC) in a report urges Congress to pare back a ballooning program by requiring more beneficiaries to work when they can. The study comes amid mounting challenges for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which helps low-income families buy groceries, snacks, and non-alcoholic drinks.

The only thing you should be able to buy with "food stamps" are non-prepared fresh foods. You know, so you have to cook them yourself. Also, its a fucking scam. Why are you allowed to buy Red Bull with food stamps? Because some bitchy liberal complained that it was dehumanizing they couldn't buy stuff like chips and soda and the junk food industry lobby ran with it because they saw free government money coming their way. **Nearly two thirds of SNAP recipients who could work did not, says the report** It is a program intended to help you while you are down. Not for you to just live off of your neighbors labor/taxes. TWO OUT OF THREE SHOULD BE WORKING AND DONT. Archive: https://archive.today/ioBKT From the post: >>The food stamps scheme used by 42 million US residents has become too widespread and costly and hooks recipients on welfare, new research shows. The conservative Economic Policy Innovation Center (EPIC) in a report urges Congress to pare back a ballooning program by requiring more beneficiaries to work when they can. The study comes amid mounting challenges for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which helps low-income families buy groceries, snacks, and non-alcoholic drinks.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (19).
[–] • 1 pt

Im with you there. Where I am from there is a saying "We help those who help themselves". You have good neighbors that will help and programs to keep people from starving or being homeless but the rule is... If you are not helping yourself (trying to do better, to be self maintaining) you get no help at all.

I would also be willing to bet the money stolen is in the BILLIONS not just hundreds of millions.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

think of how much better society would be if we werent being robbed blind. I would love to be more self sustaining, I love work, I dont consider myself a lazy person, yet I am so far behind in society it fills me with a white hot rage. Feels like we work harder now for mediocrity than we did back then for small mansions. I try to be white pilled, but it can be really hard to quell this rage

[–] • 1 pt

Well, for starters we would have a lot less career criminals in the US if there were no benefits to bring them here or to keep them "healthy" enough that they can have kids like rabbits. That would be good for society as a whole.

Less crime, less taxes, low unemployment, higher pay....