WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

679

AKA "Is we gettin' mo stimmies?"

AKA "Is we gettin' mo stimmies?"

(post is archived)

[–] 10 pts

Any dividend should be returned based on net tax paid. I.e. those who paid in the most tax, from whom the most money was wasted, would get a much larger refund. People who have not contributed net tax get NOTHING. Returning money to people who paid the most tax will give it to productive people, who are far more likely to spend that money in a productive way. Giving $5k to a bunch of useless niggers will only cause a boom in weaves, spinner rims and grilles.

[–] 5 pts

I think that would be quite easy to do - you simply get an income credit of, say, 60k this year. You make $59,999.99? You get all taxes paid back. Any income at 60k and above starts as if it was starting at $0.

There would still be some minor calculations for those who have to file state, but Federal would be easy for the majority of people.

[–] 3 pts

For clarity, using existing tax terms, you're describing a deduction.

Tax deductions reduce your taxable income. Tax credits reduce the amount of tax owed.

[–] 2 pts

Yes, but if you have no income, you would get all taxes paid back.

I understand that it’s an income credit, but it has the effect of “if you have no income to start with, you get no money back.”

[–] 1 pt

This is a good idea.

[–] 1 pt

And if you paid nothing in to start with, I.e. no income, you get no money back since you didn’t contribute.

[–] 1 pt

Also in noglet breeding because of more "da free monez".

[–] 2 pts

No. No free money to anyone. Leeches want gibs. Not "services". But hard working people could use services, not hand outs.

[–] 1 pt

Yea I agree. This just seems like a way to attract more votes though.