Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

220

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

You need to look to Congress, not the Court here. The SCOTUS ruled that OSHA could only make and enforce rules that address a particular risk of harm specifically related to the workplace. In the case of medical workers COVID is a risk of harm particular to their employment, so it stays.

The real problem here is that Congress has delegated the authority to infringe on our rights to faceless unaccountable federal bureaucracies. Gorsuch's concurrence criticizes regulatory body overreach at length, but the genie is out of the bottle on that.

Write your congressman and tell them to strengthen laws prohibiting organizations from forcing experimental medical treatments on people. Ask them to reign in the unelected bureaucrats. The Court can only say whether a law is constitutional or not. They cannot and will not save us from bad laws.

[–] • 1 pt

The real problem here is that Congress has delegated the authority to infringe on our rights to faceless unaccountable federal bureaucracies

Aka deepstate.

Congress needs to take the control back

[–] • 0 pt

Covid is not a workplace threat to anyone, even Healthcare workers. That is a retarded claim and should not be entertained as if it justifies any kind if tyranny. All communicable diseases can spread anywhere.

Congress is corrupt, the courts are corrupt, and the executive is corrupt. They are all colluding to, at the very least, maximize profits for pharmaceutical companies.

The longer they get away with it the more brazen, abusive, and bold they will become.

This will most likely only end with war.

[–] • 0 pt

That's the problem with the statue. There is no well-defined standard for what truly constitutes a risk. A risk is, for the most part, whatever the head of OSHA says it is, as long as he can keep a straight face. This is a perfect example of overly broad authority given to an unelected agency.

[–] • 1 pt

Any agency will try to expand thier power and reach by "reinterpreting and stretching" definitions. But it is not true that they were given broad authority. The language says workplace hazards. That means something unique to the workplace. At the very least something you can avoid by not going to work. There is no reasonable interpretation of that which includes communicable diseases.

[–] • 2 pts

The supreme court did not mandate experimental vaccines. They mandated the cleared version of pfizers vaccine which is not available in the US. Smart health care works will simply say that approved vaccines are not available.

[–] • 0 pt

Will it work though? I mean what’s to stop them from just firing you.

[–] • 1 pt

to be fair if you are in the health care industry you are either smart enough to know the risk or will simply be culled. they probably have backdoor saline shots wouldnt surprise me that much

[–] • 1 pt

What better way to be sure everyone in the field will toe the line and comply with your dictates? Will also mean that virtually everyone you get health care from can't be trusted.

[–] • 0 pt

"Healthcare" retards had a chance to stop this dogshit in its tracks and decided they wanted instead to be praised for dancing in their masks on TikTok, so fuck them, they can eat shit and die with their poison gene therapy.

The ones who actually did anything against this BS instead of murdering their patients have already been fired. The rest of them can burn in hell and I hope they each get 50 poison gene therapy boosters and die of blood clots and heart attacks as they deserve.

[–] • -1 pt

..r÷member that all of mengeles sycophants were VOLUNTEERS... and hospital workers are lower than others and not entitled to the same protections...