Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Ukraine, despite recent history, is still not a member of NATO. Ukrainian missiles hit Poland and killed two polish people, signifying an act of war on Poland.

Doesn’t this mean that the US needs to invade Ukraine in defense of a NATO member?

How is it that if Russia is to blame, we have to “take action” and join the war, but if Ukraine is the actual perpetrator… we send them more money?

Ukraine, despite recent history, is still not a member of NATO. Ukrainian missiles hit Poland and killed two polish people, signifying an act of war on Poland. Doesn’t this mean that the US needs to invade Ukraine in defense of a NATO member? How is it that if Russia is to blame, we have to “take action” and join the war, but if Ukraine is the actual perpetrator… we send them more money?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (7).
[–] • 0 pt

Doesn’t this mean that the US needs to invade Ukraine in defense of a NATO member?

Poland would have to ask for it. But they qualified it as an accident, not an act of war.

[–] • 1 pt

I believe that is the original point. If Russia accidentally does it and says it is an accident, would the NATO warmongers give them a pass like this time.

[–] • 1 pt

Probably not, but that's how she goes.

[–] • 2 pts

Thank goodness there was a credible independent report that identified the rockets. Otherwise, the Ukrainians might have gotten away with this false flag. NATO seemed ready to accept it.