WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

523

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I highly suggest the US provides the tanks for these reasons:

They can guzzle all of the fuel reserves. Ukraine should already knows why with the GTD-1000TF on the T-80, it can burn anything, but at the cost of high fuel consumption. Going from a diesel to a turbine cuts the effective range in half. All that dynamo power results in a much volume of air intake intake, making the tank engine more vulnerable to poor maintenance. Which in turn, increases dependency and stress on logistics.

As a bonus, any tank leaving US inventory is a tank that will stay out of US inventory forever, making our F-15s and nukes that more effective. The parts will have to go with the tanks as well. Also the recovery vehicles. And the fuel trucks.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I will also say, that throwing tanks against the Soviet "Counter-Deep" doctrine is a bad idea. Israeli tanks were worthless against it when Egypt employed it, and unlike Egypt, Russian also has air superiority.