Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

669

According to Sergey Mironov, Associate Professor of the Department of International and National Security at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry, the North Atlantic Alliance, led by the United States, is considering a large-scale strike against Russia using 20-30 thousand cruise missiles.

The latter can be placed on sea carriers in European territorial waters, and therefore Washington is seeking to expand the number of NATO member countries to increase the controlled maritime territory.

"The concept of a global strike was developed, as far as I remember, about ten years ago.

American-it is the impact of cruise missiles. I can tell you what this concept is based on.

First, the marine component. Why do they need Finland and Sweden in NATO now?

Take advantage of the waters and territorial waters of these states to bring ships with cruise missiles there. And they can bring down from 20 to 30 thousand such cruise missiles on us at the same time, " Mironov said.

According to Mironov, even though Russia has modern air defense systems, it is not possible to repel such a massive strike.

"Even with a very high-quality air and missile defense system, we simply will not be able to fully repel this strike," the military expert stressed.

At the moment, such a strike is only part of the concept being developed by NATO, since neither the United States nor the North Atlantic Alliance as a whole have such a large number of warships capable of launching missiles, while there are simply no such large number of missiles, since according to some estimates, the United States is armed with only about 10-12 thousand cruise missiles. Tomahawk missiles.

https://avia.pro/news/mironov-nato-stremitsya-nanesti-po-rossii-grandioznyy-udar-20-30-tysyachami-krylatyh-raket

According to Sergey Mironov, Associate Professor of the Department of International and National Security at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry, the North Atlantic Alliance, led by the United States, is considering a large-scale strike against Russia using 20-30 thousand cruise missiles. The latter can be placed on sea carriers in European territorial waters, and therefore Washington is seeking to expand the number of NATO member countries to increase the controlled maritime territory. "The concept of a global strike was developed, as far as I remember, about ten years ago. American-it is the impact of cruise missiles. I can tell you what this concept is based on. First, the marine component. Why do they need Finland and Sweden in NATO now? Take advantage of the waters and territorial waters of these states to bring ships with cruise missiles there. And they can bring down from 20 to 30 thousand such cruise missiles on us at the same time, " Mironov said. According to Mironov, even though Russia has modern air defense systems, it is not possible to repel such a massive strike. "Even with a very high-quality air and missile defense system, we simply will not be able to fully repel this strike," the military expert stressed. At the moment, such a strike is only part of the concept being developed by NATO, since neither the United States nor the North Atlantic Alliance as a whole have such a large number of warships capable of launching missiles, while there are simply no such large number of missiles, since according to some estimates, the United States is armed with only about 10-12 thousand cruise missiles. Tomahawk missiles. https://avia.pro/news/mironov-nato-stremitsya-nanesti-po-rossii-grandioznyy-udar-20-30-tysyachami-krylatyh-raket

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

If it's being considered, it's not being considered very seriously for two reasons:

1) Does NATO even have that many Tomahawks, JASSMs, etc?

2) The active duty personnel who'd target these aren't working nearly enough to target these many. Heck, if they started working round the clock to train more I dont think they'd have enough in the year or two it takes to get "decent" at that. Both due to military recruitment issues and physical limitations with their ocular capacity.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

As cool as modern weapons and all the military equipment is, I kind of wish the shit was never invented. People should have to fight with handheld weapons if they hate each other so much. It's just too easy to push a button and wipe out millions of people over kike bullshit.

[–] • 0 pt

People should have to fight with handheld weapons if they hate each other so much. It's just too easy to push a button and wipe out millions of people over kike bullshit.

kikes are cowards who couldn't handle direct personal combat. They have been working towards "push button" and "remote controlled" war for a long time so they don't have to show their true cowardice in real battles.

[–] • 1 pt

Something like this recently happened to isreal. There was a video, in which three jewish females were looking up, laughing at missiles flying over their heads into isreal. As a male, I understood that was too many missiles to repel effectively. The jewish females weren't laughing for long- as the missiles started touching down and exploding, they took cover next to a car and started screaming in their native tongue and crying. Was a somewhat enjoyable video, on mute. Why not aim them all at isreal and do the rest of the world a favor?

[–] • 1 pt

Normal "bombs" do nothing to standard nuke silos, so, we are talking about nukes

yes, because if USA ever attempt with "normal" bombs, the reply is going to be nukes, regardless

so, 30k nukes (or more) going off ? and .... assume, no reply ?

As soon as russia sees a volley of anything incoming, it will fire back, now they know that USA want them dead

and they are going to use nukes, obviously

so, yes, perfect plan to destroy everything we have