Sure, but i also want to have actual verifiable evidence of a thing otherwise one ends up looking like a complete q-tard if you simply go with 'well it sounds about right' with zero substantiation. This is how msm constantly gaslights it's viewers with emotion based dialectics.
Sure, but i also want to have actual verifiable evidence of a thing otherwise one ends up looking like a complete q-tard if you simply go with 'well it sounds about right' with zero substantiation.
This is how msm constantly gaslights it's viewers with emotion based dialectics.
I just keep it non specific because I know for a fact they are stealing. Both Russia and Ukraine are extraordinarily corrupt.
I just keep it non specific because I know for a fact they are stealing. Both Russia and Ukraine are extraordinarily corrupt.
Agreed, however i'm not about to just consensus bias bc some career journo schmuck tells me things i wanna hear A credible journalist that alleges criminal activity should also be able to substantiate those allegations with proof and evidence. This provides nothing - it's normie (shuffles deck) 'official corruption' porn.
Agreed, however i'm not about to just consensus bias bc some career journo schmuck tells me things i wanna hear
A credible journalist that alleges criminal activity should also be able to substantiate those allegations with proof and evidence.
This provides nothing - it's normie (*shuffles deck*) 'official corruption' porn.
(post is archived)