Just Curious, what studies did the CDC use or undertake to substantiate that assertion, lady , or is more of a case that the CDC has simply disregarded any potential evidence ?, and did she just say the IAEA unequivocally stated there is no proven link of DU exposure to .... significant health or environmental impacts ? - So another case of semantics with 'significant' meaning 'anything not found to be 100% of the time'.
I guess all the safety handling procedures, storing and discarding protocols are completely irrelevant.
Fcking honk honk.
Just Curious, what studies did the CDC use or undertake to substantiate that assertion, lady , or is more of a case that the CDC has simply disregarded any potential evidence ?, and did she just say the IAEA unequivocally stated there is no proven link of DU exposure to .... significant health or environmental impacts ? - So another case of semantics with 'significant' meaning 'anything not found to be 100% of the time'.
I guess all the safety handling procedures, storing and discarding protocols are completely irrelevant.
Fcking honk honk.
(post is archived)