Even easier is really shooting the people from multiple angles after you kill your patsy and leave him sitting there waiting to take the blame.
It’s preferable to be culpable of first degree mass murder than just fake a tv production?
No, that’s actually retarded.
If people were shot, there would be evidence.
I can find you ten examples of bad acting and obvious crisis actor bullshit before you find a single example of convincing evidence that a real shot was fired.
These people rape children... you think being culpable for murder worries them?
Yes, it’s an inconvenience and risk that is preferable not to take. Obviously. Not when you could easily fake it.
No shit. This dude is either schizophrenic or not very smart. And you know what I NEVER hear from these over-glorified flat-earthers? As they rant about "oh it's a fake crisis look those are dummies, look it's CGI, these are actors, it's all fake". You know what I never hear explanation of?
FUCKING WHY? What's the point of doing all of that instead of ACTUALLY just shooting them? What benefit would this yield?
I think this guy is just stupid because he suggested it would be easier to bribe and control probably tens of thousands of people just to avoid one guy being culpable of first degree murder, but I think a lot of the other people who think this stuff is real are schizo and have very existentially crazy theories. One time I heard one saying "oh we're the REAL people and they can't kill real people so they have to stage this to influence your perception", that kind of thing.
They did really kill people. I lost a friend from school. These demonic fucks get away with murder becuase they own the courts.
(post is archived)