Go ahead and supply the class with the isolated SARS-2 virus, not a computer model.
Done a million times. The problem with the no-isolates argument is that they say that the routine process used for decades to create isolates and sequences just doesn't work for this one virus ("tainted", "not purified"), while all other viruses where correctly isolated that way.
Then there are people who are consequent enough to say that, because isolation doesn't work at all, there are no viruses at all ("terrain theory"). But they cannot explain the mechanisms of action of the cures.
Yeah it seems that narrative pops up more and more in discussions. It’s getting hard to even have a conversation here sometimes without all the germ theory fanatics popping in.
For me, the terrain-narrative is just another conspiracy theory that got seeded to divide critics, to stop people from digging, to make people cry wolf too often, and to make us all looking like crazies.
If there is no virus, there was no crime: There was no gain-of-function research paid by Pentagon and NIAID. Fort Detrick is just a kindergarten. The Chinese had no lab leaks. Cuomo hasn't used infected people to depopulate nursing homes. The FDA hasn't killed people by not approving the cures. It was all just a misunderstanding, sorry. And, btw., don't use ivermectin - you don't need a cure because there is no virus.
(post is archived)