WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

597

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Lol yeah, unfortunately there is no choice but to use data/ articles from the research of the powers that be.

They make him look like the ugliest Canaanite Jew possible. It's based on the flawed idea that Jesus was like the MENA ancestors of the Jews, so they just take random remains that fit that profile and use them for a 3D reconstruction. According to the Talmud however, Jesus was the bastard of a Roman and a Galilean whore. They say that he's "Jewish" (the same ethnicity as them) when it benefits them to, but they don't really believe it.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/anomalous-blue-eyed-people-came-to-israel-6500-years-ago-from-iran-dna-shows/ https://pic8.co/sh/g9MQxp.png Ancient Iranian remains compared to European genotype. https://pic8.co/sh/EleAXU.jpg This comparison & distribution shows that MENA/ Middle Easterners have Negroid admixture. https://pic8.co/sh/qMMaOg.jpg This shows the genetic disparity between European and MENA populaces. https://pic8.co/sh/P8LSd5.png Here is another graph

I would like some genetic data/ anthropologist assessments on the Hyksos remains in Avaris, but I have not seen any.

[–] 0 pt

It would be nice to see ancient Celts, Greeks, Vikings, Aryans, and tibetians all grouped together. Probably moved out of china and all over the place.

This is an ok take all cartoons aside: https://youtu.be/WD-b4zvFRVE

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

One of the Tibetan haplogroups, Haplogroup D, is found in a lot in Japan but not so much in China, is it the Ainu haplogroup?

"Jews4Hitler" is right about a lot of things, and it's worth watching his stuff, but I think he is wrong about some other things.

Because he himself is Jewish or maybe a mischling (less than a quarter ethnically Jewish), he doesn't really address the genetic divergence between MENA populations and European populations, or the fact that they are a "Mixed Multitude" - https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6154.htm They try to say every populace/ ethnic group is heterogenous/ mixed, but there's a difference between mixing two groups that come from the same source and are closely related, and mixing two very divergent groups into a hybrid and then that hybrid mixes again, to produce offspring closer to the other group.

A lot of people also don't recall to mind that Judah's chosen wife was actually a Canaanite. He intermarried into a powerful Canaanite family for reasons of avarice, but then Tamara tricked Judah into making an agreement with her in exchange for sex, but was found to be the honourable one by God. But then they say Tamara was a Canaanite too, instead of an Aramean Shemite. Anyway, God killed Judah's Canaanite sons, leaving only one, but that one did not receive the promises/ inheritance to Judah, instead Tamara's sons did.

People also don't recall that the Edomites were descended from Esau interbreeding with Hittites/ Canaanites, and Ishmaelites. And they were then converted by force into Judea. Josephus wrote that Herod was half-Idumean (Edomite) and that's why he burnt the genealogical records of Judea. That implies that there was a major distinction, and the real Israelites/ Judahites would have used that information to delegitimise his rule. Josephus also wrote about the groups of Jews and he curiously wrote about the Essenes, that they were "Jews by birth," which implies that the others were not, or not usually.

I would have no problem asserting that the Jews who sided with Christ must have become assimilated into Christian, European populations, Meds specifically. I think those Jews must have been sheep rather than goats, wheat rather than tares, whilst the Synagogue of Satan were more like Herod, one way or another (through some form of intermixing along their ancestral line).

That being said, there are Europeans with MENA admixture, who aren't related to ancestry that is uniquely Ashkenazi or Sephardic, but Jews carry unique identifiers, like predisposition towards unique health problems or mental health issues like schizophrenia.

I remember finding something online about a Babylonian scribing/ record where they stated that the original Babylonian settlers (Sumerians) were from Aratta (to the north) and also had the same fair appearance as them, blonde hair, blue eyes, until they mixed with the "Dilmun" migrants from the east (Indus?) and lost that appearance over generations. At the time of writing they said they couldn't really imagine having that appearance as that was lost in the population by the time of writing, yet they still must have passed the story on down. So I agree with rendering Shem blonde in the cartoon, but I think the vast majority of Jews would say this is false, because they want people to believe that Europeans are not "Shemites" in Biblical understanding.

According to genetic studies, all carriers of the blue eye gene alleles, whether fully expressed or not, are descended from one man who lived a long time ago. That seems to indicate that the idea of "progenitors" is very much valid.

There are problems with the regional flood theory, logical and semantic issues. And the sons of Noah, the main progenitors, were very much not equal, but it was according to their behaviour & choices. Shem was blessed the most, with Japheth blessed under him, as well as their generations/ offspring, and Ham was left with no blessing, whilst his son, Canaan, was 'cursed' for being the product of incest. So that seems like a pretty clear hierarchy to me. If people are saying that all Aryans/ Europeans are descended from Noah, then they need to address that hierarchy and where the divisions are split.

Otherwise the hierarchy could stand as a reason for not racemixing, it's essentially a caste system, if someone descends from Canaan and Shem, do they receive the blessing of Shem, or the curse of Canaan, or both? If it's genetic rather than some kind of magical boon or jynx, does one basically cancel out the other so that they meet in the middle? Or does the negative overwrite the positive completely?

The apocrypha: "Testament of Simeon" is pretty interesting-

"BEHOLD I have told you all things, that I may be acquitted of your sin. 2 Now, if ye remove from you your envy and all stiff-neckedness, is a rose shall my bones flourish in Israel, and as a lily my flesh in Jacob, and my odour shall be as the odour of Libanus; and as cedars shall holy ones be multiplied from me forever, and their branches shall stretch afar off.

3 Then shall perish the seed of Canaan, and a remnant shall not be unto Amalek, and all the Cappadocians shall perish, and all Hittites shall be utterly destroyed.

4 Then shall fail the land of Ham, and all the people shall perish.

5 Then shall all the earth rest from trouble, and all the world under heaven from war.

6 Then the Mighty One of Israel shall glorify Shem.

7 For the Lord God shall appear on earth, and Himself save men,"

[–] 0 pt

Dont the jews think white people are amaleke?