>If you're pro-vax you've already lost. Pro-science, not pro vax. Follow the science, not the masturbatory libtard of ant-vax retard "science." >There aren't any valid pro-vax arguments starting with the fact that it isn't a vaccine. Oh boy. If you start the premise of the conversation with the already failed argument that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines, you've already failed. The definition didn't magically change. I linked to the earliest definition of "vaccine" from dictionary.com (first snapshot) from 2016 that clearly had both definitions of vaccine thus ending the debate of the tinfoil hatters saying the definition of vaccine changed to open the door for mRNA vaccines to be called "vaccines."