naw.... they wouldnt do that.... would they? pro-tip - no matter what it is. if it is a 'x is bad and we should replace it with y' story it will *never* have anything to do with anything but one person or group of people trying to run another person or people (or industry) out of business. people who believe green power is viable are already retarded. people who believe green power has anything to do with anything other than transfer of wealth and control are extra retarded. 'hurrrrrrrr dis noo plug in hybrid suv goes a whole..... 50 miles!' well shit thats great so my job is 200km away, the suv does about 110km and takes 4 hours to ch.... nope, brownout, it will take 4 hours to charge when the power comes back on, so ill be at work some time.... next week. that ok boss?' 'no, youre fired' 'but ... but muh power.... muh no petr...' 'yeah but green good you fired lazy cunt' i live in australia. if you think australia is ever going to be able to run on anything other than self contained combustible engines or self charging electric (im gonna go ahead and say tesla et al *will never ever ever ever ever go public with any kind of unlimited self charging system that will allow you to use an electric car in the same way or place or function as a petrol car, because then they lose control again, being able to put petrol in your car gives you about as much freedom as a moden human can get straight out of the box youre actively working against the future. hydrogen will be the go but petrol electric hybrid is the answer for now. there is *zero* argument there, and the whole 'we gots no oils left bruz' narrative got blown out of the water in the 90s.