I think you're being willfully obstinate.
Yeshua ben Yosef, the man you call Christ, is a Jewish man who fulfilled Jewish Prophecy, making him the Jewish Messiah for the Jewish People.
From his own mouth he called non Jews subhuman and said he came only for the House of Israel.
As an ethnic European, you cannot be a Christian. It's a Jewish ethnoreligion and as foreign to European blood as Judaism and Islam.
That's what you think
Reality is that your train of thoughts implies that romans willingly adopted a religion that renders them as subhuman. Which is laughable, conceptually speaking.
Personally I don't feel the need to spit on christianity, I'm not a christian hater like commies and kikes are
I don't feel the need to spit on the heritage of my ancestors, to put it simply
However, why you feel the need to do so is the real question here
>From his own mouth he called non Jews subhuman and said he came only for the House of Israel.
No, jesus didn't call non jews "subhuman", there's no such thing as the word "subhuman" in the bible. Either you're accurate or you are not. And you are not.
https://biblehub.com/1_john/2-2.htm
"He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world."
https://biblehub.com/john/10-16.htm
"I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd."
https://biblehub.com/romans/3-29.htm
"is God the God of Jews only? Is he not the God of Gentiles too? Yes, of Gentiles too,"
....
>As an ethnic European, you cannot be a Christian. It's a Jewish ethnoreligion and as foreign to European blood as Judaism and Islam.
Pfffff
Meanwhile, in europe for over 1500 years...
Europe has been pagan ten thousand times longer than it has been "Christian."
When I have time later tonight I'll quote all the relevant passages for you and spell it out so even a Christcuck like yourself won't be able to argue against it.
When I have time later tonight I'll quote all the relevant passages for you and spell it out so even a Christcuck like yourself won't be able to argue against it.
, I bet you 1 BTC this faggot gentleman never responds with the "relevant passages".
Seems he's concerned with self-hatred over debate.
>Europe has been pagan ten thousand times longer than it has been "Christian."
I'm not nostalgic of tree worshipping and human sacrifice
The "white race" (read, descents of native european tribes) never achieved unity on a racial basis, for obvious reasons (celtic and germanic tribes aren't exactly the same to name just them). While christianity, the catholic church to be more accurate, is the only thing that came very close at achieving "just that"; political and religious unity.
You're only promoting division by advocating a return to paganism here, nothing more. A paganism you virtually know nothing about, a paganism that is heterogenous and plural by definition, so heterogenous that you can only get division and opposed factions with nothing in common in the end.
Again it begs the question why.
(post is archived)