WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

For those of you that suspected he had jewish ethnicity.

For those of you that suspected he had jewish ethnicity.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The fundamental problem isn’t whether or not someone has had a bar mitzvah or eats a lot of gefilte fish. Its not even whether they study talmud although I think its a despicable book. The problem is genes.

Specically a set of genes that predispose an individual or group of individuals to utilize a strategy for survival that is based on deception and social manipulation to enslave other groups.

We may be talking about 20 or 30 different genes that cause people to implement parasitic strategies which destroy our society and all societies which create their own wealth.

These genes exist in gentile populations as well but in much lower frequencies. They are much more concentrated in the jewish community. There is a frequency distribution in that population, with some members having more of these parasitic genes than others. But even your friends are likely to have far more of these genes than you regardless of how “based” they are. The traits they confer are not always obviously “bad” at the individual level. But they have stronger skills and a greater orientation toward social and cultural phenomena at the expense of basic economically useful behavior.

Until we have a genetic test for these parasitic genes the best rubric for these traits is ethnic jewishness. There may be alot of them within the european aristocracy as well imo.

Unfortunately, I just dont think one can overcome these genes by following the path of God.

You can say something similar about blacks. Blacks tend to have a set of genes in which make them behave in selfish, violent, and “psychopathic” ways. Its not just stupid. If they were only stupid we could put up with them . Not all of them are impulsive and mean. But they are far more likely to be on average. So we have to assume that they are until we develop a blood test for this shit.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Most "Jews" have European ancestry and have no blood ties to the region at all. And an alarmingly large segment of the European population acts exactly like what you would say is Jewish behavior. Just blanket attributing it to genetics is incredibly lazy and in my opinion views humanity as little more than meat robots.

[–] 1 pt

i have a theory about the origin of jews which I go in to a little bit here if you really want to hear me blather on the subject https://poal.co/s/History/384871/ed115cbd-254e-4a7f-810b-6c7a75fd6c77

Basically I think the founding population were an endogamous priestly caste in mesopotamia that developed a parasitic strategy of living off other groups and they have been collecting people from other populations since then who have traits complimentary to that strategy. I agree that some europeans do exhibit some of these behaviors and there may be some common genes for exploitation/machiavellianism which both european elites and jews possess. This is because the exploitive nature of the endogamous aristocracy may have favored some of the same genes. We need to find out which genes these are and test all our leaders and elites for them.

[–] 1 pt

Hmm I strongly disagree with the idea that they have no ties to the region whatsoever. I think they all have some genetics from a core founding population that was probably from mesopotamia/iraq but that different blocks of their population have moved through different areas over time and picked up genetics from those places including europe. They are a continuously evolving group that collects genes that promote exploitive (parasitic) behaviors toward other groups. Think of the sort of gentiles that might intermarry with them and what traits they might have. Think of the type of jews that might drop out /convert to christianity or islam and what traits they might have. Its a selection process for jewish strategy.

There seem to be two large blocks of jews per this PCA chart: some with more genetics from southern europe and some that are more consistent with north middle east and causcasus ancestry. The first group includes ashkenazim and sephardim and seems consistent with a more “Roman” history. The second seems more “Khazar” or simply a group that stayed put more. Maybe some of both.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Atzmon.jpg

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

They are a continuously evolving group that collects genes that promote exploitive (parasitic) behaviors toward other groups. Think of the sort of gentiles that might intermarry with them and what traits they might have.

Exactly, so ideological. You keep saying "genes" as if ideology is genetic. If that were true we wouldn't have any of these fucking problems because anybody 1,000+ years ago who acted like liberals today would be dead. Henry Ford's children wouldn't have grown up to be faggots. Germany wouldn't be one of the most cucked nations on the planet. Great men and great families have nearly all seen rapid ideological decay so repeating "genetics" ad nauseam just sounds like pseudo-intellectual nonsense. And it also adds a creepy undertone like you view humanity as a bunch of meat robots that just need to be developed, built, and programmed correctly.