WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

As a former RADAR tech, I can agree that EMR kills. I've seen too many dead birds around my array to deny it.

But the EMR coming from earbuds isn't powerful enough to kill a fly, much less a person. They're safer than a microwave, which itself is pretty safe.

[–] 0 pt

But the radiation is constant, right?

[–] 1 pt

Not sure what you mean.

[–] 0 pt

Im thinking the emf from the airbuds are constant. As in they emmitt radiosignals even when charging. And isnt this one of the reasons some say they are harmful?

[–] 0 pt

Have you ever heard of the microwave experiment with the cats? Do you think it is true? I have not eaten anything out of a microwave in about 7 years.

[–] 0 pt

No, I don't think I've heard of it. But if you're asking if I think they did horrible things to cats, then yes. I'm sure they nuked more than a few.

I don't use the microwave often, but I feel fine standing a foot away from it when it's on.

[–] 1 pt

Yes, goyim, stay out of the sunlight! Don't get that deadly EMF from the sun that also lets your body make vitamin D!

Yeah, the Sun puts out massive amounts of EMF all across the electromagnetic spectrum. It killed everything. We're all dead.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

The sun outputs hardly anything in the microwave frequency range, and even less of it reaches the surface of the earth. In absolute numbers the output of the sun at the surface is about 10e-18 watts per meter squared (W/m2) @ 1 GHz. That's about 0.00000000000000001 W/m2.

In comparision something like a Bluetooth headset will output around 10 mW/m2. That would be 0.01 W/m2. That means the difference to the natural background is close to a quadrillion times.

So no, you cannot compare modern man-made radiofrequency output to the sun. It is not the same. They are not in the same frequency range, and they are not of the same power.

There are other differences too, like polarization, pulsation and modulation, which also need to be taken into account, and from a biological standpoint there is adaptation to exposure, which in nature only exist for visible light, but not for RF signals.

[–] 0 pt

So no, you cannot compare modern man-made radiofrequency output to the sun. It is not the same.

There are other differences too, like polarization, pulsation and modulation, which also need to be taken into account, and from a biological standpoint there is adaptation to exposure, which in nature only exist for visible light, but not for RF signals.

So it should be easy to prove this with a bunch of studies that are able to reproduce the results consistently. Where are those consistent results?

[–] 0 pt (edited )

First let's clarify something from physics. Physics, nameley Maxwell's Equations, says that any charged particle that moves through an electric field will be subject to a force. Coveresely, any time-varying electromagnetic field will exert a force on a charged particle, or any polar molecule for that matter. That is what physics says.

Now the next question you have to ask yourself is: are there any polar molecules or charged particles inside the human body?

If the answer is yes, then electromagnetic fields can NOT not affect these particles inside the body. If you expose polar molecules or charged particles to an electromagnetic field, then physics says there WILL be an effect.

This is physics. People that deny there could be an effect, are denying physics. There IS an effect, it is dictated by physics.

Now the next question then becomes; if man-made electromagnetic fields are wiggling all the charged particles and polar molecules inside your cells and your body, will there be BIOLOGICAL consequences to these effects?

And THAT is the billion, or in terms of the wireless industry, trillion dollar question.

What do you think? Do you think your cells, while assembling proteins from transcribing your DNA, likes that most of the molecules inside the cell suddenly wiggle all over the place? Do you think it's a good thing that that is happening, or a bad thing? Or maybe it's meh, wiggle or no wiggle, what do I care?

I only give a single example of a plausible effect inside the cell. There are many other mechanisms, most of which have yet to be discovered or properly enumerated.

The biological effects of RF exposure are not like an allergy that goes on or off. Not like a switch. The effects appear to be much more subtle. Examples of some effects are insomnia. Ringing in the ears. Difficulty concentrating. Etc. See here:

https://i.imgur.com/emNi2zQ.png

As far as studies go, here's an example from the Aachen University in Germany. They maintain a real-time database of all published studies on EMF exposure and biology. To date the database contains 34,053 publications.

https://www.emf-portal.org/en

There is also a meta-study on EMF on biology done in 2012 of 1800 studies. You can read their conclusions here:

https://bioinitiative.org/conclusions/

Now some people might say, oh, you cherry pick 1800 studies out of 30,000 studies, sure you will see effects. That might be so, but you can ignore the warnings from these studies at your own peril. If EMF was truly safe, we should not have any warnings. We should not be having a rise in gliomas for example:

https://microwavenews.com/sites/default/files/de-vocht-response.jpg

And we should not be having a rise in people reporting and suffering from electrohypersensitivity. I happen to be one of those people, and is the reason I study this stuff. I study it for a) to figure out if there is a cure, and b) to know why it happens.

But I can tell you once it happens, and it only happens through repeated exposure, and one day your body will go haywire, and you will not be able to fix it any more.

I am here to warn people. Most will not listen. Many will be fine. Some won't. Many will not know that their insomnia is caused by keeping their WiFi router on next to their beds. Many will not realize their stiff neck or their tinnitus is caused by their wireless exposure. Or their forgetfulness or irritability.

Most will not listen, and most will not wake up until the exposure among the population is so high, the effects can no longer be ignored.

[–] 0 pt

Is it specific to apple or is this all headphones?

[–] 0 pt

It's highly unlikely that any wireless exposure long-term is good for you. Personally I would never wear any wireless headphones. I do not use a cellphone either for the same reason. But is that what you really wanted to hear?

Most people only like to hear someone telling them that the people selling you these gadgets confirm they are safe. And that is indeed what they do. Only if you read the fine print of your cellphone will you see that if you touch your head with the phone while talking, you have in fact made them free from any liability of damage. So there's that perhaps to take into account.

[–] 0 pt

Apple airpods use higher quality EMF designed in California. It will kill you, but you have to have a monthly subscription for it to be painless. All other brands use cheaper EMF that will kill you with varying degrees of pain but you usually only have to watch ads or pay once for it.