So it’s just a coincidence that that tower seven also fell into its own footprint?Three buildings, three perfect falls, demolition-style. Too much of a coincidence for me to get on board with all that. I might agree with you if one of the buildings toppled over, but all three fell perfectly into their own footprint.
So it’s just a coincidence that that tower seven also fell into its own footprint?Three buildings, three perfect falls, demolition-style. Too much of a coincidence for me to get on board with all that. I might agree with you if one of the buildings toppled over, but all three fell perfectly into their own footprint.
Like I said. I'm with you on WTC 7 and how that's sketchy.
But yes. If a building buckles from the middle to top it's only logical they fall straight down (into its own foot print). Unlike a building buckling from the bottom. I revert back to the fact about heat and how that affects the strength of steel. They teach this in every engineering curriculum; strength of materials.
Like I said. I'm with you on WTC 7 and how that's sketchy.
But yes. If a building buckles from the middle to top it's only logical they fall straight down (into its own foot print). Unlike a building buckling from the bottom. I revert back to the fact about heat and how that affects the strength of steel. They teach this in every engineering curriculum; strength of materials.
(post is archived)