Lol. Not a logical fallacy when your post actually concurs that data, study's, research etc was promulgated showing 'smoking did not cause harm .....' etc etc. That the data was gamed and incorrect is neither here nor there as my original contention was this information was pushed and advocated for decades in the public sphere. Which you note it was.
You can cherry pick whatever data you want to support your false Covid assertions. All that State by State 'snapshot data' your using is 'relative case rate data' not 'absolute case rate data' and is a common ploy to obfuscate overall data into watered down snapshot datum points and hoping that whoever reads it doesn't already now about that little trick - plus it is wholly remiss of what all the actual data may show. Your the one wilfully pushing msm agenda propaganda. Shill.
However go argue with CDC Walensky, Dr Fauci et al all who are on record saying the vaccines do not prevent transmission between vaccinated individuals or provides lasting immunity. Or the literature that describes the vaccine is to 'reduce one symptoms', ergo they dont present as symptomatic, they then can pass it on to other fully vaxx, who are also unawere. A study of 1,174 individuals is not conclusive for anything - how is it that hundreds and thousands of fully vaccinated around the world ( many is the most highly vaccinated nations, so it's not the unvaccinated causing this but what i just outlined previously) ending up in hospital with serious covid after being fully vaccinated ?/. Transmission between vaxxed and lack of immunity. The fact that you can only counter that with 'breakthough cases of the sick and elderly...' simply confirms my statement - fully vaxx can and are transmitting covid to other fully vaxx. Which segues to the point - endemic serious illness has always been known as more deadly to the frail, sick and elderly individuals - if they want the vaxx , go for it, but for all the (presumably) healthy individuals injecting with something they have no long term data for is completely ridiculous, bad science and irresponsible.
Just lol, they are 'experimental' - that's what phase 1 and 2 trials are - testing experimental drugs/ pharmaceuticals and is why they are also referred to as 'investigational vaccines' in publicly available literature. The FDA has concurred that mRNA vaccines (Moderna 2020) are a 'Gene therapy'. Duh.
Got any actual links for the clinical testing data of toxicity, cytokine, reproductive, immunity etc etc .
Phase 3 trials are still ongoing you liar, and are not due to be completed until end of 2022/ beginning 2023.
Phase 1 and 2 clinical trial data were recipients that were only monitored for 1 week and then 2 months post 2nd dose and that is what they used to derived the 'safe and effective' - not exposing those vaccinated in the trials to the actual virus to see if the vaxx prevented it - they just simply never caught it in those two time periods of monitoring. Lol.
In conclusion , you fail at this so bad it's laughable. I initialy thought you may have been on to something with the ccp stuff, but that's a smokescreen, your a simple minded shill narrative pusher - whose post is full of provable lies and common obfuscations of someone that is simply parroting convoluted talking points in the hope it comes across legit. Claim i'm literally killing people - wahahahaa , Cope harder faggot. What a shill.
EDIT: -Why didn't you link the Japan data / literature that they are using regards the Pfizer vaxx that the young are at 40x more risk of myocarditis/ pericarditis after a pfizer jab ??. Or that blood clots are also a known safety signal in the publicly available literature for the pfizer mRNA vaxx.
I didn't read anything you wrote. I do not see a single citation so there's an asymmetric conversation happening.
It's not worth my intellectual capital to invest in a conversation with a dishonest actor. But I did type everything up so I could just copy pasta when the CCP shills come out with their disinformation.
Lol, if you read didn't it how do you know what any of it was about but yes you run along now and take your msm talking point propaganda with you. You have no sensible good faith counter to the easily verifiable information i stated. Nor do i need citations when your argument is simply wrecked by common sense, logic and easy to find open public data. I gave all the individuals involved, the organisations and what they state. All easy to verify. That you are unwilling is an indictment on the lack of your intellectual honesty. The clinical data i speak of, is the same covid vaccine clinical data you have been posting about. LOL Every thing i wrote is all easy to find publicly available information. That you are no longer able to obfuscate with 'snapshot data and relative case loads by State' because i called you out on it, is why you can not give any good faith reply's. That you are too intellectually dishonest to continue, and then attempt to claim some moral high ground is typical behaviour of shills, charlatans and liars. ERGo, Why you lie about the Phase 3 trials being finished ??. Why did you omit the Japan pfizer vaccine safety data for 40x risk of myocarditis/ pericarditis??. Why you refuse to acknowledge blood clots is a known safety signal for the pfixer vaxx??. See, dishonest. You're a lying sack of steaming shit lmao.
Redo your previous reply but cite every single major point with a credible source.
Then I'll respond.
(post is archived)