There are a lot of assumptions and semantics wrapped up in this comment. Jesus was born to jews. It is purely semantics to argue if he was the first christian or if the first chriatians were his followers. You can even argue that christianity didn't start until he was risen and fulfilled the prophesy. You seem to have, based on the context in which your comment is made, strong feelings on this matter which insinuates that you think these semantics hold important meaning. I have to disagree on that fundamental belief. It does not matter if jesus was a jew because the jews of today are decendents of the jews who rejected him and his teachings. There are no jews today who can claim to be related to those people who followed jesus. Furthermore, the great works of christiandom were done by european chriatians. Christians in africa and south america did not build great cathedrals. However, since jews destroyed the faith of these europeans everything is crumbleing. With nothing to believe in greater than their own hedonistic perauits even the great white man is reduced to rubble.