>Well you tell me>>
I asked you first lol. Seriously, planes don't vanish into bldgs., they crumble.
This is like a cartoon.
Whether planes or no planes, the video can't be taken seriously (that one should be dropped out of the plane-no plane argument).
I'm not going to go over the other points, been there done that, have work to do and shouldn't even be yapping on here right now....was making sure you were sane, or at least reasonable.
Are you "AreWeSure" from Voat?
Aircraft aluminum crumples and shatters so easily under real force, I don't really get your position are you saying the plane should have come through the other side?
What's difficult?
I'm saying they wouldn't make a cartoon cutout into such a structure. There would have been some, at least some, crumbling of the plane upon impact (birds crumple plane noses even).
The plane WOULDN'T have come through to the other side, it would have been extremely damaged upon impact, not make a Roadrunner cartoon cutout.
Are you talking to the right commenter?
You know the fuel is stored in the wings right? That much liquid with that much mass and velocity being directed by the wing, yeah I'd buy that there is damage resembling a wing. It's not a perfect cut-out either, you see beams that are intact and beams which have crumpled or bent or sheared, can't say the same about the pentagon strike though.
The strike causes sparks and heat which ignite's the liquid fuels and as it rushes through the building along with debris it comes out the other side in a giant fireball, which is what we see in the video
(post is archived)