WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Yeah, i know, old fucking news for us niggerfaggots in the know.

But this video is very good to show the uninitiated.

Yeah, i know, old fucking news for us niggerfaggots in the know. But this video is very good to show the uninitiated.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Dude, you need to go look. You obviously haven't done any, any research at all. People from the balconies, from the top of parking garages, in cars going by all capture the explosion...but no plane. They are CGI planes. Depending on the network, the right wing disappears right before impact, another the left disappears, another the tip of the left wing goes behind the building in the background then comes back out, another the entire froot half of the plane has merged with the building up to the front of the engines with zero fragments or impact.

[–] -1 pt

Even the video itself lies when the guy is talking about the vanishing wing, that building isn't larger and further away, from all these shots you can see it's where it should be in the skyline to produce the result he is saying is impossible. watch this and I think you are going to change your mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hApRZ_7v2A this looks like a plane strike to me, not a normal explosion. pro tip you can go frame by frame on youtube using "," and "." on your keyboard.

CG planes on 9/11, at the twin towers is flat earth tier glownigger gaslighting.

[–] 0 pt

Talking?? it is video, the tip of the wing goes behind the tower in the background, then comes back out. Not possible except with CGI.

[–] 0 pt

At 9:30 in the OP video the guy talking says the wing should be infront of that brown building, it shouldn't, look at the video I linked, you can see that building in the skyline, it's below the plane not behind it in the skyline, if it were in the skyline behind the plane it would be at least half the height of WTC 1&2 and right next to them.