I'm betting the camera was pointed away because he was checking something on the camera itself, I can't say I know that but he wouldn't have moved the camera so much if he wasn't checking it or changing positions, because he was obviously filming the scene with some intent to record this for posterity. As to the other videos removing the plane from the footage would be easy, the one obvious bit of disinfo is at 9:30 in the OP video the guy claims the wing disappears behind a building when it should not here is a compilation of footage, 50 different shots of the second plane strike: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hApRZ_7v2A at 3:35 the same footage in question appears and you can see it's the same angle with the same vanishing wing, but in the rest of the video you can see the video it vanishes behind is clearly closer to the ground, there is no other large brown skyscraper behind the towers, the guy in the OP video critiquing the footage at these times is obviously fool of shit with a simple examination of the skyline. meaning who ever compiled the footage either too lazy to check the footage or intentionally trying to deceive us. Why paint out the plane? why digitally remove it after the fact? why push flat earth? alienation and discord. You don't need to believe in a CGI plane to believe it was a false flag, so why push this unimportant narrative component. besides I'm sure you can admit that in all 50 of these shots the plane and it's motion are surprisingly consistent if it's CGI, even modern CGI sucks at comping moving objects and keeping their scale and movement identical across multiple shots. If this were done today it would require advanced 3D scans and motion tracking rigs to be this accurate. across all 50 perspectives. I found the shot I saw as a child when it happened live, I was watching the "CBS: live camera" shot as it happened.