Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

A physicist would have been a better person to interview than an arborist. His reasoning about the fires from the tree evidence does not explain how an energy weapon works and what it is actually capable of. The public got their ideas of what lasers and other energy beam devices are from (((movies))) and (((TV))). The public is ignorant (or retarded) when it comes to understanding these things, but they certainly think they are experts on the subject.

Why do you want to believe this is the true cause of the fires so badly? What do you gain from supporting this theory? Be honest with yourself on these answers because it will reveal what your internal fears and motivations are which are (((used))) to control you.

[–] • 2 pts

There you go. The people are "retarded." I warned you about pride.

[–] • 2 pts

There you go. The people are "retarded." I warned you about pride.

You exhibit pride every time you call someone sick, evil or corrupt because you think you are none of those things yourself. Pride is a two-way street and you are full of pride as well.

[–] • 2 pts

If you can't see in my convo that I'm the first to admit that then I don't get it.

Yes, I'm a sinner, a work in progress. But publicly I try not to come across as proud though I guess I don't do too good a job.

I would wager I was a much bigger sinner than you, in my younger days, and a disgusting human being until I was changed. Just ask my wife.

[–] • 2 pts

Where do I call people "sick" and evil, unless it's objectively obvious?

I hope you don't think I'm saying that of you.

[–] • 2 pts

>Why do you want to believe this is the true cause of the fires so badly? What do you gain from supporting this theory? Be honest with yourself on these answers because it will reveal what your internal fears and motivations are which are (((used))) to control you.

Ah, you're a psychiatrist as well. Is it possible that people "really want to believe" simply because they want and value the truth rather than they "need to believe" and this will reveal your "fears and motivation"?

Granted, that IS true about some, but to make a statement like that without actually or really knowing people is just hubris.

[–] • 2 pts

Granted, that IS true about some, but to make a statement like that without actually or really knowing people is just hubris.

Yet you have no problem calling all these Deep State people evil and sick without really knowing them. You just base it on what you want them to be. See how that goes both ways? Think, Bopper. That's what my purpose in life is...to make non-thinkers think.

[–] • 2 pts

I don't call people sick and evil unless it's obvious. I do call them sinners because I believe that to be a fact about everyone.

>Think, Bopper. That's what my purpose in life is...to make non-thinkers think.

But what if I am the same way, and what if I feel like I'm trying to make YOU think?

We can call it a draw.

[–] • 2 pts

Don't mind bopper, he's one of the dumbest people I've encountered in here since Lakota

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

You may be correct about a physicist. The arborist isn't 100% correct, but he isn't 100% wrong either. I know this because my husband is one. I don't watch TV or movies, and haven't for a very long time. I can't say what started the fires. I wasn't there. I can say the military has put out enough info themselves on these weapons.

https://truththeory.com/navy-releases-video-of-high-energy-laser-weapon-destroying-a-drone/

[–] • 2 pts

Selling this "healthy American" brand in the first ten seconds of the video. This is grifter tier modified hangout bullshit.

[–] • 0 pt

So what? It's called getting reimbursed for your research, thoughts, opinion.

Are you a purist in that everyone who does this is a lowlife (oops I put words in your mouth) grifter.

Expand your thinking (or I will call you a faggot).

[–] • 1 pt

Twin Towers.

[–] • 1 pt

Twin Towers.

Explain the physics behind energy beam weapons causing the kind of damage seen in the towers. Get really detailed here because it will be necessary to substantiate your claims. If you do it correctly, you'll have discovered a whole new area of physics and you deserve the credit for it.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Shucks, I would just refer you to Dr. Judy Wood. But I'm confident she's just a whacko. I have no idea what went on in Maui, I haven't looked into it.

Do you know that I can explain construction methods, theology and other various and sundry topics either using obscure (to the layman) or non-obscure terminology? Or a combination? Or, first obscure then a 'subtext'?

It would be to your benefit (and others probably, maybe) if you did the same on the subjects you feel you know well. You can't just baffle them with numbers and math and physics and expect to win them over (if you indeed do wish to win them over).

You feel me?

You want all those heady upvotes from folks who just think you sound good?

I also know this rocket scientist (below) as well, talked to him on the phone several years ago inadvertently while trying to reach his kid. He was played by Ron Howard's little brother (of Gentle Ben fame) in Apollo 13 (which rumor has it that it was a cooked up script in answer to people griping about the moon landings interrupting I Love Lucy reruns).

What do you think, is that possible?

But whatever the truth is, on anything, that's all I care about. I member my first foray into the interwebs and being fooled by "Hey look, it was the SS driver that actually shot JFK, see him turning around and see the gun in his hand!"

Well crud, I forgot my rocket scientist video.

[–] • 0 pt

It would be to your benefit (and others probably, maybe) if you did the same on the subjects you feel you know well. You can't just baffle them with numbers and math and physics and expect to win them over (if you indeed do wish to win them over).

I do this all the time. I am well versed in this field so I provide the information that others don't know or don't want to believe as fact. I'm not here to coddle the weak minded. That's not going to help people who only think in emotional ways. We're way past that and they need to be smashed with facts and reality instead of perpetuating their child-like ignorance.

You want all those heady upvotes from folks who just think you sound good?

I don't give a shit about upvotes. I'm here to make people think and give factual information in my fields of expertise. And I don't drop names of the people who are public figures that I know in hopes of impressing someone on this site. Ahem.

[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

You really have a unnatural connection to this stuff. So much pride in who you know. The fall commeth.