It would be to your benefit (and others probably, maybe) if you did the same on the subjects you feel you know well. You can't just baffle them with numbers and math and physics and expect to win them over (if you indeed do wish to win them over).
I do this all the time. I am well versed in this field so I provide the information that others don't know or don't want to believe as fact. I'm not here to coddle the weak minded. That's not going to help people who only think in emotional ways. We're way past that and they need to be smashed with facts and reality instead of perpetuating their child-like ignorance.
You want all those heady upvotes from folks who just think you sound good?
I don't give a shit about upvotes. I'm here to make people think and give factual information in my fields of expertise. And I don't drop names of the people who are public figures that I know in hopes of impressing someone on this site. Ahem.
Might as well hear it from the horse's mouth, that being Dr Judy Wood who explains the discrepancies extremely concisely. Even then, her full lectures explaining all of the evidence takes an hour and a half to two hours. In a way, it'd be a disservice to try and simplify it. If you're not interested enough on alternative theories as to how the towers collapsed, that's fine.
Okay, fair enough. For the most part.
Yeah I do name drop but I think people, most, find it interesting. They're just stories. I know I like to hear them from others.
I used to have an inordinate 'desire' (for lack of better terms or word) to be a celebrity, and I guess the infatuation still remains to a degree.
After high school I went straight to Hollywood to be somebody but blew all my dad's money, like the prodigal son in the Bible. Really stupid.
Finally came back home and settled on being a 'commercial artist' and made that happen.
(post is archived)