The fact is, many normies listen to him.
Hence half the video is an advertisement.
Him speaking to what we've known will help raise questions and interest on topics now and in the future. It's a big WTF for people to hear that they are planning for the fall of civilization while others are telling them they are pushing for the fall of civilization.
That's not a bad thing, but it's secondary to the advertisement. I don't think his priorities are aligned with ethics and instead using his audience for his own gain with some doomspeak thrown in to inform them on the side.
In turn further moving people to the us vs them collectives. It's good to know what others see and hear.
An "us vs them" push is the same division tactic used by the jews. He shouldn't be polarizing and dividing people. It's a dangerous take because we already have so much division and he just seems to be fueling that more. It's one thing to inform. It's a completely different thing to influence. People need to decide for themselves based on information rather than being told what side they need to be on. Your opinion will likely vary and I'm not going to get into another one of our famous argument threads on this. I've chosen the hill I will die on and this is not that hill.
An "us vs them"...
You should watch because you've not only taken out of context what I stated but your railing against something which doesn't exist - based on you taking my statement out of context.
The us vs them is the humanity vs Jew topic. It's time people see themselves vs the people doing this stuff. If you have an issue with that, you have serious issues.
You should watch because you've not only taken out of context what I stated but your railing against something which doesn't exist - based on you taking my statement out of context.
I did watch it. That's why I knew half of it was an advertisement.
The us vs them is the humanity vs Jew topic.
He didn't name the jew.
It's time people see themselves vs the people doing this stuff. If you have an issue with that, you have serious issues.
Without naming the jew, it's just a message of "us vs them" which could be anything. The jew must be named or they get to continue hiding in the shadows and normies will still love them. I do have a problem with that. You should too.
He didn't name the jew.
We both know that's not going to happen and your position is unrealistic. People don't live in a vacuum, as much as Jews pretend we do. Naming would end his career. You know it. I know it. Most people can connect dots so long as crumbs are left. That's the important part. If this were not true, they wouldn't need AI to censor everything. In spite of this, the truth is growing out of their control.
While we all want them named, the insistence that a message is low value or worthless without it borders on the insane or neurotic. It's not reasonable and in general, not plausible. Yet I see this insanity among many here.
(post is archived)