The Poal.co warrant canary

As of Friday, May 4, 2018, We (Poal) have never received:

National Security Letter, of any type, for any purpose

Personal requests from any law enforcement agency worldwide or corporate entity for backdoors in any software and/or hardware projects to which we currently am an active contributor, nor are we aware of other contributors to these projects having received such a request

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court orders of any type

Subpoenas and/or search warrants accompanied by a gag order pursuant to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act

This statement will continue to be updated manually.

The Poal.co Free Speech Canary

Poal.co declares itself to be a Neutral Public Forum and claims protection under Section 230 immunity

Poal.co declares it is open to the general public for use

Poal.co commits to not removing content unless it is illegal or any form of child sexualization.

Poal.co commits to not banning users unless they post illegal content or if they compromise the site functionality (Spam, DDoS, etc.)

Poal.co delegates moderation of speech on the site to the users themselves via the Owners and Moderators of individual subs

The Owners and Moderators of individual subs may restrict speech but only at the risk of that individual sub loosing Neutral Public Forum status and the Owners and Moderators of that individual sub loosing Section 230 immunity. Poal.co itself maintains Neutral Public Forum status and maintains Section 230 immunity because anyone can create a new sub and talk about anything they want.

The Only Addendum I would like to add is that if a sub owner is determined to be an abusive mod, I may transfer that sub to another user(Abusive mod is defined by actively censoring relevant discussions or information)

Poal Admin, PMYB2.

The Poal.co warrant canary As of Friday, May 4, 2018, We (Poal) have never received: National Security Letter, of any type, for any purpose Personal requests from any law enforcement agency worldwide or corporate entity for backdoors in any software and/or hardware projects to which we currently am an active contributor, nor are we aware of other contributors to these projects having received such a request Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court orders of any type Subpoenas and/or search warrants accompanied by a gag order pursuant to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act This statement will continue to be updated manually. The Poal.co Free Speech Canary Poal.co declares itself to be a Neutral Public Forum and claims protection under Section 230 immunity Poal.co declares it is open to the general public for use Poal.co commits to not removing content unless it is illegal or any form of child sexualization. Poal.co commits to not banning users unless they post illegal content or if they compromise the site functionality (Spam, DDoS, etc.) Poal.co delegates moderation of speech on the site to the users themselves via the Owners and Moderators of individual subs The Owners and Moderators of individual subs may restrict speech but only at the risk of that individual sub loosing Neutral Public Forum status and the Owners and Moderators of that individual sub loosing Section 230 immunity. Poal.co itself maintains Neutral Public Forum status and maintains Section 230 immunity because anyone can create a new sub and talk about anything they want. The Only Addendum I would like to add is that if a sub owner is determined to be an abusive mod, I may transfer that sub to another user(Abusive mod is defined by actively censoring relevant discussions or information) Poal Admin, PMYB2.
[–] Ivan 5 points (+5|-0)

And here I was expecting this would take a few weeks.

[–] AOU 4 points (+4|-0)

Weeks? Niggah, are you telling us that boobs2 is Putt?

[–] RepublicOfTX 2 points (+2|-0) Edited

bruh Putt is super busy and burnt out y'know, we owe him so much, warrant canary isn't important on a free speech site, so you need to stfu mmmkay /s

[–] x0byte 2 points (+2|-0)

Not only that, but he's made several updates to the site as well. Clearly the owner must be some single loser without a job and no kids (or none on the way).

[–] PMYB2 2 points (+2|-0)

Actually, I have a wife a full time job and 2 kids with one on the way for the record. No wait shit I meant I have none of that my bad. I live in my parents basement and shit post all day.

[–] PMYB2 2 points (+2|-0)

Nope it’s done. I’m sure it could be refined but I think for now this wording and method is if nothing else effective.

[–] Ivan 1 point (+1|-0)

Well done man. Good hustle.

[–] PMYB2 5 points (+5|-0)

I just realized I might be the only site on the internet with a free speech canary, thanks for the idea buddhastorch

[–] I_Would_Gas_You 1 point (+1|-0)

Let's be huge ingrates and slander admin like on voat goys!

[–] x0byte 2 points (+2|-0)

I just CAN'T BELIEVE that this admin had to wait until 3 or 4 DAYS after bringing the site active to post a freaking canary! This site is CLEARLY compromised!

Plus this guy wants us to show our boobs.

Not to mention the fact that NOBODY can remember, yet alone TYPE out his user name!

You are all reddit-tier fags!

[–] PMYB2 3 points (+3|-0)

SERIOUSLY WHAT IS THIS FAGGOT ADMIN DOING 4 GOD DAMN DAYS! WTF! CLEARLY COMPROMISED!

[–] PMYB2 2 points (+2|-0)

Slander away, I’ve got a thick skin and I’m more than happy to throw a few comments back at ya. Lol

[–] venturer 1 point (+1|-0)

Instead of removing the canary link at the bottom of the page, you should just have it redirect to this sub.

[–] Battlefat 1 point (+1|-0)

Canary, noted. Faggot, detected. Jimmies, rustled. Penis, erected.

[–] COFfer 1 point (+1|-0)

Excellent. Much needed and appreciated. Since this is a (quasi)-legal document, I wanted to point out a possible typo so no agency could use it as a loophole somehow:

...to which we currently am an active contributor..

That may be correct but struck me as "am" should be "are". I could be wrong. Just thought I'd point it out.

[–] PMYB2 2 points (+2|-0)

Will address in the next one, if I change it doesn’t that kind of invalidate it?

[–] x0byte 1 point (+1|-0)

One other typo I noticed (I'm the last one who shoudl point out typos or grammatical errors)...

The Owners and Moderators of individual subs may restrict speech but only at the risk of that individual sub loosing Neutral Public Forum status and the Owners and Moderators of that individual sub loosing Section 230 immunity. Poal.co itself maintains Neutral Public Forum status and maintains Section 230 immunity because anyone can create a new sub and talk about anything they want.