![Do you? [827x407 - 53KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/xOotD5.jpg){kind=link}
Undeniable physical harm vs imaginary "harm" makes for counter examples wrong and incompatible.
Immune system in 99% effective. They claim 85% effective and then brinkmanshiped their way to 95% effective. They are falsely claiming efficacy of the body's immune system.
You have some basic research to do. Including in logic.
Undeniable physical harm vs imaginary "harm" makes for counter examples wrong and incompatible.
Immune system in 99% effective. They claim 85% effective and then brinkmanshiped their way to 95% effective. They are falsely claiming efficacy of the body's immune system.
You have some basic research to do. Including in logic.
You misunderstand. It’s 85% effective against the 1% of remaining non-effective immune systems.
You misunderstand. It’s 85% effective against the 1% of remaining non-effective immune systems.
Is that their story now? If that were true they would only give it to the infirm. But they don't, do they.
House of cards on a mountain of lies.
Is that their story now? If that were true they would only give it to the infirm. But they don't, do they.
House of cards on a mountain of lies.
That’s always been the story.
There are multiple studies worldwide that confirm the vaccines are effective.
That’s always been the story.
There are multiple studies worldwide that confirm the vaccines are effective.
(post is archived)