Okay. I get it. But I still think it is a good example of the flaws of capitalism. I don't understand how a lot of people still think capitalism is a good system contrary to socialism. It also results in a small group of rich people who get all the power, like they are criticizing socialism.
>Okay. I get it. But...
Time to subvert reality to fit your narrative.
>I still think it is a good example of the flaws of capitalism. I don't understand how a lot of people still think capitalism is a good system contrary to socialism. It also results in a small group of rich people who get all the power, like they are criticizing socialism.
The problem is you're not thinking enough, friend. Do you think these companies could get as powerful as they are without creating a consortium of the top companies? Could these companies survive or be as large without government subsidies?
These are not properties of capitalism, it's a symptom of corporate rule (Corpocracy).
(post is archived)