WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

"My wanderings have shown me that individual happiness and prosperity flourished moest freely in Mexico under the autocracy of Diaz, Russia under that of the tsar, India and Egypt under that of England, and China when the son of Heaven exercised supreme and unquestioned sway"

and: " The man who wishes to govern England today is obliged to conform with the dishonest devices and servile stratagems of democracy".

From: The Confessions of Aleister Crowley.

"My wanderings have shown me that individual happiness and prosperity flourished moest freely in Mexico under the autocracy of Diaz, Russia under that of the tsar, India and Egypt under that of England, and China when the son of Heaven exercised supreme and unquestioned sway" and: " The man who wishes to govern England today is obliged to conform with the dishonest devices and servile stratagems of democracy". From: The Confessions of Aleister Crowley.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Crowley was not a man on which to pattern a system of government. First off, he was a hopeless drug addict. Second, he was completely insane. Third, he was a psychopath. Fourth, he was a liar who may never have told the complete truth in his entire life. Fifth, he was a sexual pervert and degenerate of the worst kind. Sixth, he was a Satanist, literally -- he called himself the Great Beast. He may also have been a murderer, but if so, he managed to elude justice on this matter -- he is rumored to have killed two people, one in Egypt who, he claims, tried to robe him. If the robbery story is true (highly doubtful) it may not have been murder, but more likely he killed an Egyptian boy over some kind of sexual wrangling or dispute.

Exactly. Looking to Crowley for advice on running anything is a bad joke.