WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

So once you have excluded anything but the right golgoklaxons what's left of white europeans? Jews like you?

Make a list of europeans you exclude from being white, entertain me, I need to lash out at a piece of shit and here you are!

[–] 1 pt

His official position is all Aryans are "street shitters." That's all you need to know.

Technically "White" was defined by America's founders and Italians & Irish weren't included in the citizenry (but Jews were, to Benjamin Franklin's dismay.)

[–] 0 pt

White defined by founders? Like what founding fathers? Not to my knowledge. Unless you can prove your claim, by quoting at least one founding father on the matter. The constitution doesn't refer to blacks or whites to begin with, so if it was that a paramount parameter for them, it should have been featured in

>The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free White person(s) ... of good character", thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks and later Asians and Jews, although free blacks were allowed citizenship at the state level in a number of states. The Act was modeled on the Plantation Act 1740 with respect to time, oath of allegiance, process of swearing before a judge, etc.[5][6]

...

WASP, as in white anglo saxon protestant, became a thing much later on But again, in WASP, if you need to add "white" to "anglo saxon" it means that "white" defines something more than just anglosax

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

I meant to say that the term "White" didn't exist prior to the founding of America.

Anglo-Saxon is specifically Germanic English, where as "White" = Northern European (rather than meaning Northern & Southern European) https://i.imgur.com/LZ2KOjw.png (There is some overlap there of course.) ​ When the Founding Fathers talk of "Posterity," they are referring to their own genotype. They are all pretty clear as to what they define as being the "White" genotype by how they described them physically & 'spiritually'. I doubt they ever thought they had to write a standard definition listing all exclusions, because the identity is just something that was overtly self-evident. They also didn't have access to all the scientific testing we have now.
​The term was designed to homogenise the various Northern European nations into one nation (under English religion/ culture/ language), on the basis of their overlapping similarities, their inheritance and their shared origins. If they all continued to exist as different national identities then their new house would collapse from the division. It is like when Alfred the Great united Celtic peoples & Anglo-Saxon peoples under one identity and one religion.

Between Northern Europeans and Southern Europeans, who defines what "White" is, as an identity or classification? Who is prototypically "White"? The purpose of it is to preserve the posterity & society of White folk, it is not to be inclusive towards everyone who is vaguely related or else they'd be forced to include other Caucasoids, like Middle-Easterners, Northern Africans & Indians, to remain consistent. At the moment, Jews define what "White" was/ is, because of their monopoly over the education system & the media and over Secret Societies. And they say it's just skin colour- which is laughable, imagine thinking an Albino African is "White." ​ https://i.imgur.com/3I4Ojc7.png Here is Benjamin Franklin arguing that the Jews are not White but Asiatic & destructive to European interests. ​ https://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/founding-fathers-think-race/ This also has some pointers to look into.

You are right about Naturalization. Italians were legally viewed as "White" for naturalization purposes, which is understandable, since they are genuinely European & have such an amazing historical heritage, but, in practice, they were not considered wholly White because they looked different & didn't readily fit in as well with other White people. This is why Italians got on so well with Jews in America, as they both felt like marginalized outsiders. Sicilians definitely weren't considered White, but at the time Northern Italians also disparaged them as being lesser. Sicilians are still Southern Europeans though. Irish/ Iberians were also legally White and included in the Naturalization legislation, yet they were considered as being racially "primitive," and were cruelly forced into slavery, although that was just WASP Freemasonic snobbery & rationalisation. It wasn't a scientific distinction. They are actually very closely related to English, and it shows when we see how well Irish have blended into American society. There are no Germanic peoples that are without a degree of Celtic admixture, and in any case the disparity between Celtic and Germanic is very slim.

[–] [deleted] -1 pt (edited )

What part of "It's OK to be Italian" don't you understand?

Call them "Honorary Whites" if you want. Call them Europeans if you want. Call them Aryans if you want. Fine, all that is true.

We can get along with our cousins just fine.

But "White" can only be applied to the Germanic Peoples. "White" means something VERY specific, and Italians don't meet the definition of "White".

[–] 2 pts

You are yet another obvious fucking jew trying hard to push for endless layers of division among native europeans here, nothing more, hence the badge

Let me be clear; there's the dumpster, the dog shit in the sewer, and there's you, that's the natural order of things here, know your place jew

[–] 0 pt

obvious fucking jew trying hard to push for endless layers of division among native europeans here

ironic coming from an abrahamic. kike worshippers have no room to speak.

What part of "It's OK to be Italian" creates division?

It's not like we can't defend Europe together you know.

But you put an Italian and a German next to each other and...

  1. It's clear they are not the same peoples.
  2. It's clear who is "White".

So, let's not pretend.

[–] 2 pts

White is a made up word. You are fuckin retarded. Italians are just as European, Aryan and of a similar mixture of Neanderthal and Cromagnon. German is German and Italian is Italian. They're different. Neither of them are "white".

White is just a word for mongrel. When Europeans blend so much they no longer identify with German, Swedish or French but instead they call themselves "white". No German Traditionalist would ever put themselves in a category with Italians. They stand apart. They also would never put germans or Italians into the category of "white"... No one belongs in the White category. Even if you're half Swedish and half French. You should identify as Swedish and French, not white.

For example in Africa they don't go by black. They go by Sudanese or Tuti and they have their own regional religions they identify with. In the other hand the black folk in America had all their native culture, language and religon stripped from them by their own people selling them to foreigners / merchants to be slaves. The slaves identify as black becsuse their culture was stripped and they where relocated as slaves. Identifying as black is for slaves. Identifying as white is no different than identifying as a slave to the merchants.

If you think German and Italian are the same thing, you have no idea what you are talking about.

But "White" is not the same thing as "European". Sorry, it just isn't. To be "White", you must be worthy of creating the future race of Ubermensch. That is the Germanic Peoples. It's about genetic purity and genetic potential.

Ubermensch did not have a specific race or ethnicity, but was more about being Eugenic and upholding self-discipline, honour, noble principles & having a strong purpose as well as being considerate of both family and nation. Untermensch did not mean "everyone who is not white" or "everyone who is not German" it is basically what some call a "spiteful mutant."

The NSDAP were not secret Neo-Pagans or Atlantis-obsessed Vril-magicians, and if they were that means they did not uphold the honour they proclaimed as a key value in life, and were as deceptive as their enemies.